>
>>All this talk about soldering irons makes me think how crummy
>>too much American industrial design is.
>>
>>Some US industrial design looks great but some looks
>>downright, well, Russian.
>>
>>Sure you can see crap-looking design in western Europe too but
>>there's a lot less of it than in the US.
>>
>>Take soldering irons for example. An ordinary soldering iron
>>in the US with unregulated temperature still has great big
>>mofo screws holding the tip.
>>
>>By comparison, my 30 year old British-made basic Antex is a
>>sleek looking baby and those Antexes are not particularly
>>expensive.
>>
>>Don't start me on the looks of cars!
>
> If you buy cheap, you get cheap.
> Get a Metcal. No screw at all.
>
>>Don't start me on the looks of cars!
>
> Mini. Citroën. Vauxhall. Volvo. Rolls. Porsche. Fiat.
>
formatting link
dublin-deux-chevaux-20.4.jpg > > John
>
Yup, you're right! Which is why I wrote: "you can see crap-looking design in western Europe too ..... but there's a lot less of it than in the US".
One distinctive feature of US car design is a look I call: "I've just rammed a wall"
Mercifully, it is almost never found on west European cars and hopefully never will be. It is illustrated below.
There are probably 200 US cars with this sort of styling:
This is not a concept car and you can actually buy one for a reasonable price. I lately had the pleasure and that thing sure corners well. Best of all, on the freeway it doesn't use more gas than a compact passenger car:
Well, I am not a great fan of US passenger cars. Not because of the looks (where I could care less because that doesn't matter to me as a buyer) but because of reliability. US trucks, however, are real work horses and they don't really have any EU equivalent. AFAIK only two foreign companies, Toyota and Nissan, make such trucks.
For good reason. In 1978, the congress critters passed the gas guzzlers tax:
The typical land yacht, with about 15mpg, pays about $4,000 in gas guzzlers tax.
The idea was to discourage big ugly oversized non-commercial vehicles. However, they exempted anything over 6000 lbs GVW. So, in accordance to the law of unintended consequences, the industry simply delivered monstrous vehicles that officially weighted 6001 lbs and save a bundle on the taxes.
Of course, the government derives substantial revenue from taxing what are now economy and mid size cars, so don't expect the situation to change in the foreseeable future.
Jeep reliability and build quality is, however, a bad joke. I've had the opportunity to compare ten year old Jeeps (Cherokee and Grand Cherokee) with my ten year old Ford - the Jeeps have all been in poor condition at lower mileage. I've also found the Dodge/GMC trucks to be better built than Jeeps, which seems odd. I conly guess that the old AMC spirit of building rubbish that falls apart still prevails at Jeep.
What's wrong with the 300C? Put a mesh grille on it and most people think it's a Bentley. I don't mind kicking the septics for their dreadful taste in car design, but the 300C or Merc E-class as we call it here, is a relatively successful design. It's just a shame that the powertrain and suspension engineering isn't as good as the chassis.
Joerg gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying:
I've never driven one. Nobody this side of the pond feels they need to compensate quite that badly for such a tiny penis.
But, fortunately, we can refer to the official figures.
That'll be
formatting link
btw.
The extra-urban number for the 'vette is 31.4mpg. Quite impressive, I'll agree, given the type of vehicle.
But not exactly comparable with the official extra-urban figure for a "compact passenger car" - let's say a 1.6TDCi Focus. 74.3mpg.
If you look at the much more representative combined figure, the Focus achieves 62.8mpg vs 21.2 for the 'vette. That's the "economical" 6.2 'vette - the 7.0 Z06 and supercharged ZR1 are worse, of course.
As for the Viper... The official figures for the SRT10 roadster (only Viper we get through official channels, so the only official figures) are
The Excursion is holding up spectacularly well. 125k mainly urban miles and nothing serious has fallen off or broken in close to seven years. Trim doesn't squeak or rattle (but is resolutely 'hard touch'), leather is as new, engine is still near-silent and incredibly smooth, gearbox is obscenely smooth shifting and responsive. I'm amazed how good it's been.
It's needed a couple of wheel bearings (understandable at 5 tons, up from 3 ton 'standard' weight), an alternator (again understandable with extra electrical loads) and the AC radiator changing (once again, extra load compared to factory spec).
Only things that have broken that you could reasonably blame Ford for are a coil pack went down at 110k miles (£27) and the fuel tank sender has packed in, but only to the gauge - the computer still knows how much fuel is in there.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.