302 crate engines

Have a 90 mustang and the 302 is getting tired...are the Ford crate engines any good...advertise 340 ponies or so...or go with a more beefy engine from the after market. Just for street duty...but...

Reply to
Johnny
Loading thread data ...

They're pretty stout, and should last longer than the rest of the car. They are just about the best bang for the buck going.

Reply to
.boB

On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 18:26:08 -0400, "Johnny" wrote something wonderfully witty:

The crate engines are great and probably the best bang for the buck.

Reply to
ZombyWoof

This really is a serious question. How does an engine become "tired". If compression is OK and air/fuel/ignition parameters are nominal shouldn't it put out about the same power as a "new" 302?

Howard

89 5.0
Reply to
Howard Nelson

On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:43:06 GMT, "Howard Nelson" wrote something wonderfully witty:

Who knows what he meant by it? I focused on his question about the crate motors. Although there are other issues then just the compression & air/fuel/ignition which are major factors to be sure. You can have your cam/crank/valve train/rods etc, all of which can be dealt with on a one by one basis, but if you have a high mileage & worn engine and are looking for the best bang for the buck, an engine swap is probably the quickest, easiest & cheapest.

Reply to
ZombyWoof

are you interested at all or comfortable with doing the rebuild yourself? freshening up a tired engine at best could be inexpensive assuming the crank, block and cylinder bores are serviceable and not in need of major machine work. tear down the block and see where it's at before you make a decision.

Reply to
Carl

"freshening up" are you talking about rebuilding the engine? That term "freshening up" grates like fingernails on a chalk board.

It kinda denotes a less than professional, or sub-standard attempt at rebuilding an engine, without the required machine work or new parts.... generally also entails everything under the hood having a new matching coat of rattle can paint.

Reply to
My Names Nobody

the care taken at a good rebuilder, along with the fact that most upgrade stock components with better than factory stuff, even when rebuilding to "stock" specs, allows the rebuilt engine to develop horsepower closer to the "theoretical" factory numbers. 5.0 parts and performance have come a long long way since the 1990 car in question, then if you "spec" the motor with different cam, rocker ratios, and so forth it is possible to build a very streetable reliable motor in the 325HP to 400 hp range, for very close to the cost of a "stock" rebuild. even local supplier like pep boys and advance auto can order motors that are warmer than stock. Here in south west FL, AER rebuilders, Fred Jones, and Jasper have good reputations as far as reliability and power.

Reply to
walt peifer

i'm thinking you dont have a clue and are looking for an arguement.

Reply to
Carl

Oh, I have a clue, and plenty of years REBUILDING engines correctly. The term "freshening up" when used in conjunction with an internal combustion engine is half-assed and inappropriate.

Reply to
My Names Nobody

i stand by my statement. you find all kinds in (nutjobs) the newsgroups

Reply to
Carl

I wonder what brand of douche he uses to "freshen up" his engines. ;-)

Reply to
Hairy

you guys crack me up.

Reply to
Carl

That what comes to mind every time I hear a wanna-be mechanic say he is going to "freshen up" an engine...

Reply to
My Names Nobody

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.