America's Most Drivable Cities 2003

From MSN:

America's Most Drivable Cities 2003 Most of the time, driving is a pleasurable and relaxing experience. But motorists sometimes find themselves at the mercy of rough roads, traffic jams, and high gas prices. The new "Most Drivable Cities" study ranks 77 U.S. cities based on how easy it is for residents to drive around their city.

America's "Most Drivable Cities" have smooth driving surfaces, free-flowing traffic, low gas prices, and a pleasant climate. So, fasten your seat belt and check out the best and worst cities in which to get around:

The 10 Most Drivable Cities

  1. Corpus Christi, TX
  2. Brownsville-Harlingen-San Benito, TX
  3. Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX These south Texas cities share several characteristics that make them great for motorists. All three cities have very low gas prices and a good driving climate with little snow and hail, and few days below freezing. Drivers in Corpus Christi spend only 6 hours per year stuck in traffic, compared with the national average of 62 hours per year. Corpus Christi also has the lowest travel time index (an indication of free-flowing traffic) of any city in the study. In Brownsville drivers spend only 5 hours annually in congested traffic, and only 5% of the freeways are congested during peak periods. Like Corpus Christi and the Brownsville area, Beaumont-Port Arthur has little congestion. It can get hot in these cities though, and they have slightly more wind and ultraviolet radiation than average. Also, Texas' urban roads are rougher than average.

  1. Pensacola, FL

  1. Fort Myers-Cape Coral, FL These two Florida cities score well in every category. The roads are smooth and uncongested, the weather is clear, and the gas prices are low. Both Pensacola and the Fort Myers-Cape Coral area have a low travel time index and little annual delay per peak road traveler.

  1. Oklahoma City, OK Oklahoma City scores well in the mobility category thanks to a low travel time index and little annual delay per peak road traveler. The climate for driving is a bit better than average and gas prices are very low, but Oklahoma's drivers have to put up with bad roads.

  2. Birmingham, AL Birmingham's scores are above average in every drivability category. It has very low gas prices and a good travel time index. The climate is good$#151;little snow, hail, and wind$#151;and the roads are smoother than the national average.

  1. El Paso, TX El Paso has very low gas prices but the roads are rough. Mobility is good too$#151;the travel time index is low and there is little annual delay per peak road traveler.

  2. Memphis, TN Memphis scores well in all the categories$#151;low gas prices, good mobility, mild climate, and smooth roads.

  1. Tulsa, OK Tulsa has very low gas prices, good mobility, and a driving climate that is better than average. Oklahoma's rough urban roads kept Tulsa from ranking higher.

The 10 Least Drivable Cities

  1. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA
  2. San Francisco, CA Los Angeles was very clearly the least drivable city studied. L.A. has the nation's worst mobility$#151;the highest travel time index (1.9), the highest annual delay per peak road traveler (136 hours), and the highest roadway congestion index. San Francisco has the highest gas prices in the nation (.20/gallon). Although both cities have rough roads, they have great driving climates.

  1. Chicago, IL Although its gas prices were lower than average, Chicago scores poorly in every other drivability category. The Windy City has rough roads, a poor driving climate, and slightly worse than average mobility.

  2. Denver, CO Denver has a very poor driving climate and rough roads. Traffic congestion is slightly worse than average mobility, but at least Denverians pay less for the extra gas they use when stuck in traffic.

  1. Boston, MA Like many large cities, Beantown suffers from rough roads and slightly worse than average mobility. Low gas prices help offset a generally poor driving climate.

  2. Oakland, CA Oakland has very high gas prices, very rough roads, and a great deal of traffic congestion. Like nearby San Francisco, Oakland's only positive is its great climate.

  1. Detroit, MI The Motor City has very rough roads and a driving climate that is worse than average. Drivers who can put up with those deficits are rewarded with average congestion and low gas prices.

  2. New York, NY Motorists in the Big Apple contend with rough roads and slightly worse than average congestion. The plusses: New York has average gas prices and an average driving climate.

  1. Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA The Emerald City has worse than average mobility and slightly rougher than average roads. On the other hand, it has a better than average driving climate and average gas prices.

  2. Washington, D.C Traffic congestion and rough roads make D.C. a difficult place to get around. On the positive side, the nation's capital has a better than average driving climate and lower than average gas prices.

Other Notes:

Overall, cities in the Northeast rank poorly, with Philadelphia at #44, followed by Hartford at #53 and New York at #70. Meanwhile, Southern cities enjoy high rankings due to low gas prices, little traffic, short travel times, and fair climate. The most drivable large city is Atlanta, which ranks 20th overall. San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose have the highest gas prices in the nation. You'll be exceeding the daily average of 2 1/2 hours spent in the car by a typical American if you live in Washington, D.C., Miami or Seattle, when it comes to traffic congestion and average travel time. Detroit, Fresno, and Sacramento have the roughest roads. Keep the AC on when driving in San Bernardino, Austin and San Diego, which take the top spots for warm weather climates. Bringing up the chilly rear is Anchorage, Rochester and Buffalo, where your car's heater will be on for much of the year.

Patrick '93 Cobra

Reply to
Patrick
Loading thread data ...

I'm amazed I don't disagree with more of these:

  1. Oklahoma City, OK Oklahoma City scores well in the mobility category thanks to a low travel time index and little annual delay per peak road traveler. The climate for driving is a bit better than average and gas prices are very low, but Oklahoma's drivers have to put up with bad roads.

Bad roads is an understatement no way this belongs in the top 10. This state and Arkansas will test your suspension. if you happen to be going through both of them and you likly are get set for a day of misery.

Bad cities I can't believe didn't make the list:

St. Louis: At some point on I70 you pass a sign that boasts of America's first paved interstate, established in the early 40's I think... The running joke is that was the first and last time it was ever paved.

NYC... Unbelievable sure LA traffic is bad, but at least most of the roads are drivable. LA (the whole state actually) adds nice touches like ignoring the standard interstate marking system in favor of their own "better" system... No exit numbers, no mile markers (only county by county mile markers which reset at each county) etc. But that's the socialist republic of California for you, in NY everything is either unreadable, confused by the glut of other signage, wrong/outdated or you have to pay some crazy sized toll. NYC being the "center of the universe" all the mile markers count down to it... which is perfectly worthless unless you're actually going to NYC.

Nashville is an utter mess of alternating left and right hand merges and construction.

Most drivable STATES now there's a fun ranking to think about...

Reply to
Simon Juncal

I couldn't agree more. I live in Olympia and the entire I-5 corridor from Olympia to Sea-Tac Airport can be a nightmare during morning-lunch-evening rush hours (yes, we have 3 separate rush hours). It plays havoc with our dispatchers everyday when we attempt to get people to the airport. We have started suggesting to our customers to consider booking the next earlier shuttle to cover any delays caused by traffic congestion.

This was a good find for reading. Thanx Patrick!

Reply to
Greg B.

I think a big part of it is there are just too many people driving around here.

Illinois road construction is a shining example of quality union labor. :)

Chris

Reply to
Chris1

Something they forgot...

On the negative side, the majority of the cab drivers get their license from a gumball machine and some of the commuters drive even worse.

-- Mike King Black 2000 Spring Feature GT Steeda Tri-Ax and K&N "Member Since 96" .

Reply to
Mike King

I think the only thing that keeps our area from the top 5 is the fact that the most severe weather we see is rain. If we had a little more extreme weather during the winter, it would easily be in the top 5. I started working 4/10's just to avoid one extra day in traffic. I've now moved to riding the bus since the $6.50/day parking was also killing me (and I ONLY had to walk about 4 blocks to the office at 4:45 am at that price).

If you're going anywhere in this area, you'd better be out of Seattle by

3:00 pm and that's almost too late. 3:00 am, on the other hand, is usually smooth sailing.

Steve (Live from Ottawa)

99 Ranger 4x4
Reply to
A Guy Named Steve

I've been in Boston and found it much easier to just find a place to park the car (a major challenge in itself) and just take the public transit systems. I don't think I've ever been to a place that's been worse to drive, but I haven't been to a lot of the cities mentioned. I drove around Chicago... ended up on a freeway through the city once. It wasn't too bad, but I didn't venture into the city. Boston was just miserable.

I'm surprised that Pittsburgh didn't rank higher on the list of cities that suck to drive around in. We have wonderful winter weather, which in turn makes for potholes the size of your car in the spring. We have construction to fix those problems every year, and each summer they block off one major artery into or out of the city. There is no easy way to go West directly from the city. The parkway really is a "park" way around rush hour, when it's just as productive to shut the car off and read a book. There are three lane roads going into a two lane tunnel with a stoplight at the end. Due to the topography, we have a few tunnels, tons and tons of bridges (getting lost on the way home tonight I crossed the same river three times within 6 city blocks), and lots of windy hills. The construction detour maps look like pretzels. Hell, the regular maps look like pretzels. At least you can read the regular maps in the comfort of your own home, and not have to memorize it in thirty seconds while on the freeway.

For example, when the tunnel is open (closed this year for repair), for me to get to the airport requires me travelling South to, and then through, the city. I take a state road to interstate 279. Merging onto 279, I must immediately cross three lanes of traffic to avoid ending up at the ballpark or some other area that I don't wish to be. Then, as I'm on a bridge, another couple lanes of traffic merge on. I now must be where they are and cross three more lanes of traffic. The bridge structures amaze me though... three levels of bridge over top of the stadium parking lots with on and off ramps. Anyway, now I've jumped lanes twice, and we're approaching the tunnels, but wait, another merge, and more lanes to jump. The people merging almost always need to be where you are, and you need to be where they are. All this to stay on the same road I merged onto just 3-4 minutes ago. Unless it's rush hour, then I merged onto the road 20 minutes ago and I still haven't crossed traffic yet. ;-)

JS

Reply to
JS
[ Hey, replying to three people at once! ]

Around 7/11/2003 10:45 PM, A Guy Named Steve spake thusly:

Any of you Washingtonians read a couple months back about how I5 needs to be COMPLETELY torn up (as in, down to dirt) and redone from about Boeing Field to the county line? Seems that our infamous Interstate is already about a decade and a half past it's expiration date:

or

formatting link
(for the cut-n-paste challenged)

Rain, rain, rain, rain, cold rain, some mist, maybe a drizzle or sixty, and more rain. Maybe a month or two of sunshine thrown in, just to temporarily dry everyone out. If that's better than average, I'd hate to see the average. :)

Eh. About $1.59-1.69 for 87 at the snootier places like 76, Chevron, and Texaco. Figure $1.49-$1.59 at the cheap gas stations. Not too bad, like they said; about average.

Heck, Olympia to Marysville, with very few exceptions in between. :)

I'd call it more like one continuous rush hour from about 7AM-7PM, give or take an hour or three.

Add the excessive and ineffective security screenings, and a traveller might as well leave for the airport a full day /before/ they're scheduled to depart. :)

Actually, I'm starting to miss the rain right about now. I'm getting tired of sitting in traffic and baking in my AC-free Mustang.

I *love* my UPASS. $35 per quarter will get me a ride any time and anywhere on Seattle Metro, Sound Transit (including the Sounder), and Community Transit. I think Community Transit also has an agreement with Everett Transit, so UPASS might work there as well.

It may take a little longer when there's light traffic, but it's well worth the time considering the hassle of paying upwards of $8 for parking at the UW (where I work). Plus, the trips home (in the carpool lane) around 5:30 PM are much quicker than I could manage riding alone.

Hehe. Too true. Stay away! Far, far away! :)

Have fun in Canada, Steve!

Reply to
Garth Almgren

I'll have to read that one... I can only go so fast on dialup up here. I know they were saying that the 520 bridge is beyond it's expiration date when they closed it down for their annual inspection a couple of weeks back.

At the rate they do things around here, you probably won't ever see that project finished though.

It's raining up here in Ottawa right now, and a coworker's wife asked if the climate is really similar to ours. I said it is if you were to add several FEET of snow duruing the winter and temps often below 0.

Try flying Air Canada! They're handled by (bankrupt) United at SeaTac. I got there 2 hrs 45 min early and spent 1 hr 45 minutes just getting checked in!!! The only reason it was that fast was because they had to keep pulling people out of line that would otherwise miss their flight! Oh yeah, then I had to be security screened. That actually took only around 20 minutes. I got lucky and came up just as they opened a new gate. I walked right by people who had already spent about 20 minutes in line and weren't moving.

I heard it was back in the 90's (I'd rather have 100+ in Vegas), although my wife didn't mention it when we talked last night.

Ever since the county merged with Metro (local bus system) my ID badge is my bus pass. I think it covers the same areas the UPass does. I think they started the UPass back when I was at the UW. Back then you had to put a little decal on your ID card. I could easily pay over $10/day for parking, but I'd rather walk the extra 4 blocks to save the money.

This is my last day. I fly out at 7:45am on Sunday. I'll be home (barring problems) at noon. Gotta like flying against time.

Steve (Live from Ottawa)

99 Ranger 4x4

Reply to
A Guy Named Steve

I hope there's no way to track you down as the "previously mentioned association that does not exist anymore" may not take kindly to your comments.

LJH

95GT

Reply to
Larry Hepinstall

Rather a simplistic comparison IMO. The only considerations in this survey were climate, road roughness, urban mobility, and gas prices.

No data about price of insurance, registration, or excise taxes.

No data on price of all-day parking in a central-city lot; no data on number of spaces in central-city parking lots, or on number of metered parking spaces, or on number of non-metered spaces which are not reserved for residents. No comment on price of being towed, price of storage after being towed, probability of being towed for a simple parking violation, or degree of difficulty in finding a car which had been towed.

No consideration about how many years it takes for insurance surcharges to wear off (6 years in MA), or about the incremental price of insurance surcharges. No comparison of aggressive meter maids, or speed traps, or photo-radar, or ticket quotas for state/city police. No statistics on waiting time at DMV/RMV (MA, once horrible, is now very good), or on whether common renewals can be done on-line or by mail instead of requiring visits to DMV/RMV. Nothing about price or validity of safety or emissions testing.

No differences noted in street signage. (I like the Boston habit of only labeling minor streets at intersections: if you don't know where you are, you shouldn't be there. )

-- Cheers, Bob

Reply to
Bob WIllard

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.