Ford's New Interceptor!

formatting link
While currently only a prototype, Ford has to produce this car!

Patrick

Reply to
NoOption5L
Loading thread data ...

formatting link

Of course they should. Although I keep hearing the mechanic in 'Mad Max' saying it's ""the last of the V8 Interceptors".

formatting link
Of course as we all know.... is a Ford Falcon.

Reply to
Brent P

snipped-for-privacy@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote in news:J_ydnZ87ReV82wXYnZ2dnUVZ snipped-for-privacy@comcast.com:

It's really Ford's take on the Chrysler 300. It should've been on the road at least two years ago.

Reply to
Joe

True true... but nice car: 400 horse is crazy, and alternative fuel, and a manual.... There is a car I would consider buying.

Brad

Reply to
BradandBrooks

"BradandBrooks" wrote in news:5a5mh.547372$R63.178219@pd7urf1no:

This is all old stuff. 425hp 6.1 Hemi 4-doors have been available for quite a while now. As usual, Ford is years behind the competition.

BTW, E-85 is nothing more than a band-aid.

Reply to
Joe

Same could be said about Chrysler's Challenger, except the time frame would be about 20 years ago.

Me too!

Unless we're talking about pony cars.

And as already noted Chrysler doesn't offer a manual transmission. The CTS-V has one, and Ford will soon. C'mon Chrysler, get with the program.

Patrick

Reply to
NoOption5L

snipped-for-privacy@aol.com wrote in news:1167699461.539583.203390@

48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com:

True. Back when the Mustang debuted, Chrysler Corp. had the Plymouth Barracuda, but it wasn't really a direct competitor. You're right in that the Challenger was produced in direct competition to the Mustang. Of course, Darts and Valiants were around back in the early '60s, as were Falcons.

Ah, but we're not. We're talking 4-door sedans with big horsepower.

True. However...

Considering that the Interceptor is only a production idea at this point, it'll be interesting to see when "soon" will be. ;)

Reply to
Joe

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.