terrorists love this car !
- posted
20 years ago
terrorists love this car !
Exactly where did you get this information? There are very few foreign deliveries of Mustangs and none to any terrorist infested locations, that I'm aware of.
Further, there's no place in a Mustang to hide any significant amounts of explosives. Finally, you're an idiot for just making that statement without any references to specific events.
I agree, there are no known accounts of a Mustang of any era being used for car bombs that I know of.
Maybe he's thinking of the Pinto?
Maybe he's thinking of the Pinto?
Uhh... Wasn't that a stock item on those? :-)
The pinto was a bomb in it's self. No special planning needed, just a tank of gas. ;)
me thinks the Troll stinketh!
Or maybe a Grand Marquis! Joe '03 GT 'Vert
Maybe he is thinking of the Mustang II, since it was built on the Pinto chaises all you needed to do was put something explosive in back (like putting gas in the tank!) and have it stall in rush hour traffic.
I've never heard something so ridiculous. The Mustang II was not built on a Pinto chassis, sorry, nope, your way off base on this one...............
Bill S.
Ir> Maybe he is thinking of the Mustang II, since it was built on the Pinto
Not only that but it was only one year on the Pinto and the Pinto only. Few people seem to know WHY some of those Pintos would boom if rear-ended properly.
quote Bill S.
" Few people seem to know WHY some of those Pintos would boom if rear-ended properly." end quote
im sure it has something to do with the fuel tank location and lack of a good fire wall
The Pinto had a fuel tank that was on the outside of the car floor. It wasn't the same as the vintage Mustang that used the tank top as the trunk floor. One of the contributing factors in the Pinto fires was that the gas tank was actually crushed against the rather jagged castings of the rear axle assembly. This burst the tank, spilling its contents and well I'm sure there was plenty of sparking metal going on in such a violent event. IIRC the first "exploding" Pinto was hit by a similar vintage Lincoln Town Car doing 90 mph. Very few modern cars would come out of that equation with flying colours. If you look at many new cars gas tanks they have a thick plastic surround on them. This is a legacy of the Pinto events. StuK
Sorry you miss quoted me. Mine was as follows:
"I've never heard something so ridiculous. The Mustang II was not built on a Pinto chassis, sorry, nope, your way off base on this one..............."
Bill S.
j.moffett wrote:
I'm pretty sure I'm right on this one, but keep in mind I'm using thirty year old mental recall to dredge up that little factiod. At that point in history my car of choice was a 66 GTO.
Although the Mustang II was shall we say a "Pinto based designed" It shared very few actual chassis parts with the little horse car. Much like the original Mustang really isn't a Falcon when you look at it though it does share parts and most certainly its whole basic chassis design too. StuK
And I'm sure you are incorrect. And the construction of a 73 Pinto differs very greatly in safety construction of what 73 model?
the same as
burst the tank,
Car doing 90
them. This is
Not exactly jagged axel parts, but close. :oP
Too easy. :) Seat belt mounting bolts.... somewhat not surprisingly, the old Mustangs have the same general configuration, but haven't gone boom... that said, a full tank of gas and the right impact angle and you never know...
Brad S
Too EASY??? Heh, you're the first one to post it. That's because the Mustang of the time had it's own seatbelt bolts, the Pintos that exploded had leftover LTD bolts that wer too long and punctured the tank.
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.