Uh huh... you can lie to THEM...
I know better Spikie m' man!
| >All things being equal, (and when are the every really?) the 351 tends | >to get a few 1-5 miles per gallon less then the 302 (no first hand | >experience with the 289). I have had different 302's get between 10 and | >22 miles per gallon. | >
| >But what one gets really is a poor indicator of what another will get... | >
| >I had an 82 4x4 Bronco that got 16 MPG with a 302. I changed only the | >engine, put in a completely stock rebuilt (Ford re-manufactured) long | >block, same ignition, exhaust, carb and intake and the same bronco went | >from 16 MPG to 12 MPG. :-( That really sucked. | | Hey! Spikey Likes IT! | 1965 Ford Mustang fastback 2+2 A Code 289 C4 Trac-Lok | Vintage Burgundy w/Black Standard Interior | Vintage 40 Wheels 16X8" | w/BF Goodrich Comp T/A Radial 225/50ZR16