Agreed. But my point is that it's a lot of trouble for not much. No seat of the pants difference anyway. I own both, a 90 LX 5sp (A9L) and a 94Gt ragtop...
The problem is much more in the intake/tb area than with the computer...You can tweek that engine all you want but until you un-choke it nothing much will happen...
Just 2 cents
Serge
The A9L computers are considered to be the best performing computer of
> all the EEC-IV MAF units. The timing and fuel tables are more agressive
> than other versions.
>
> Serge wrote:
>
> > The question is why? What are you after? There is little difference between
> > these programs. The EEC units are basically similar. Your unit actually has
> > a faster cpu clock than a 90 A9L would if my memory serves me right. From 94
> > on the eprom is also flashable. So in all a better unit than an old A9L...
> >
> > Just 2 cents.
> >
> > Serge
> >
> >>I wonder which would be better for the 95 GT. Should I buy the tweecer
> >>programmable chip and load the A9L tables onto the 95 EEC, or just do a > >
> > A9L
> >
> >>conversion (both ways would be about the same price). Or are there some
> >>things that the 95 EEC just won't handle at all that an A9L can? What do
> >>you think? Thanks....
> >>
> >>--
> >>Jason
> >>95 GT 5spd
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>