That "Ken and I" clause is redundant. There is only Ken. No "Sarah Ehrett".
HERE is some substance: You'll remember our having disproved the existence of a "Sarah Ehrett" a number of months ago.
The thread generated more than 1,000 posts, by people proving the non- existence of "Sarah Ehrett", as well as your frantic denials, in the face of all evidence, that "Sarah Ehrett" is simply a figment of your imagination.
To refresh your memory:
Subject: RESOLVED: There is no "Sarah Ehrett"
Here's a link to that thread:
Here's a quick reminder, a little taste of what can be found in that thread:
=3D How do we explain THIS article, which shows that Sarah was still =3D married to Bill Czepiel in 2009? =3D
Here's some piss for ya:
We see that Sara(h) was still married to Bill in 2009. However, Sara (without the "h") signed a post coming from ninety7gt @ cox.net in
2000:And here's some WIND for ya:
I guess you couldn't figure out your own name here:
Profil von ninety7gt @ cox.net Unter dieser E-Mail-Adresse wird mit folgenden (Nick)-Namen gepostet: Mrs Ken Ehrett, Mrs. Ken Ehrett, Sarah, Sarah Czepiel, Sarah Czepiel/ Ehrett, Sarah Czpepiel, Sarah Ehrett
Much more of interest in that very long but informative and entertaining thread, Ken. Remember?
:o)