SUVs are DEATH machines!

Not to mention they are ugly, lumbering, etc. Probably the stupidest urban adaptation of a vehicle of all time, the SUV not only guzzles gas, it kills lots more people too. Never mind the people IN the SUV as the study below talks about, how about when an SUV bumper impacts a car, at window level!!

New research from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia shows that children riding in SUVs have similar injury risks to children who ride in passenger cars. The study, published today in the journal Pediatrics, found that an SUV's increased risk of rolling over during a crash offset the safety benefits associated with larger, heavier-weight vehicles.

The study, part of an ongoing research collaboration of Children's Hospital and State Farm Insurance Companies, looked at crashes reported to State Farm involving 3,933 child occupants between the ages of 0 and

15 years who were in either SUVs or passenger cars that were model year 1998 or newer. Rollover contributes significantly to risk of injury in both vehicle types and occurred twice as frequently in SUVs. Children involved in rollover crashes were three times more likely to be injured than children in non-rollovers.

Children who were not properly restrained in a car seat, booster seat or seatbelt during an SUV rollover were at a 25-fold greater risk for injury as compared to appropriately restrained children. Nearly half of the unrestrained children in these crashes (41 percent) suffered a serious injury versus only 3 percent of appropriately restrained children in SUVs. Overall, injury risk for appropriately restrained children in passenger cars is less than 2 percent.

"SUVs are becoming more popular as family vehicles because they can accommodate multiple child safety seats and their larger size may lead parents to believe SUVs are safer than passenger cars," said Dennis Durbin, MD, M.S.C.E., an emergency physician and clinical epidemiologist at Children's Hospital, and co-author on the study. "However, people who use an SUV as their family vehicle should know that SUVs do not provide superior protection for child occupants and that age- and size -appropriate restraints and rear seating for children under 13 years are critically important because of the increased risk of a rollover crash."

In the 2005 Partners for Child Passenger Safety Fact and Trend Report, Children's Hospital reported that SUVs in child-involved State Farm crashes increased from 15 percent in 1999 to 26 percent in 2004, while the percentage of passenger cars decreased from a high of 54 percent in

1999 to 43 percent in 2004. There was no or little growth in the percentage of minivans in the study population - 24 percent in 2004.

"We want parents to be able to make fully informed decisions regarding the choice of vehicle for their family," says Lauren Daly, M.D., co-author of the study. "Ideally, a safe family car has enough rear-row seating positions with lap-and-shoulder belts for every child under 13 that requires them, and enough remaining rear-row positions to install child safety seats for infants and toddlers."

Previous Children's Hospital research has shown that, within each vehicle classification, larger heavier vehicles are generally safer. For instance, of all passenger car classifications, large and luxury cars feature lower child injury risk than mid-size or small passenger cars. Among SUVs, mid-size and small SUVs had similar injury risks, which were two times higher than large SUVs. Compact extended-cab pickup trucks present a unique risk to children -- child occupants in the rear row of compact extended cab pick-ups face a five-fold increased risk of injury in a crash as compared to rear-seated children in all other vehicle types.

Parents who are unsure of how to choose and install car safety seats or booster seats can visit

formatting link
to find educationalvideos and information, or they can locate a certified child passengersafety technician in their community who will teach them how to installthe seat properly.

Source: Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

This news is brought to you by PhysOrg.com

Reply to
michaelanderson4
Loading thread data ...

HOGWASH!

Reply to
351CJ

You're not related to Rich, are you?

Reply to
Jim Warman

ROFL

Reply to
John C.

If we didn't have SUVs... somebody might be forced to jack a pickemup truck about four feet in the air..... tack on some cow killer bumpers, grill, and a winch. I investigated an accident where a CJ with a power winch T-boned the drivers door of a Supra... Guess who won...

No surprise... so it's evened out risk.

So does being thrown from a 'vert....

I do believe that it makes little difference whether it's an adult or a child... if not restrained in some sort of seat, a body in motion tends to stay in motion unless and until acted upon by an opposing force.... right through the windshield.....

And who paid for this study which reveals pretty much things which anyone with half a brain should know anyway?

And PETA has studies which "prove" that fish scream in pain when hooked....

Another waste of funds which could have been put to better use.... It's like paying a few million to fund a study to show that water is wet.

Reply to
Spike

Reply to
Wound Up

LOL very a propos, Mr. Warman (tips cap)

Reply to
Wound Up

Okay, I wanna see that....

Reply to
WindsorFox

So is your mother, but "ugly" all a matter of opinion.

More opinion. It's no different than a truck, van or elivated wagon.

Mine can get the same milage as a Mustang. The best I have clocked sofar is 18MPG and that is with a V8 pushing roughly 350HP.

BS. And the moral of this tale is "Don't pull out in front of a truck."

Were you born a wussbag or did your mamma dress you in girls clothes? Go eat a steak for corn sake and maybe rent a truck for a couple of days. Get some testosterone for a change...

Reply to
WindsorFox

His alter ego. Or the end result of Rich and that weirdo (which will remain unnamed) up north breeding.

KJK

: : :

Reply to
KJ.Kate

Your attitude is what is killing the American car market. But keep it up.

Reply to
michaelanderson4

Reply to
cprice

The fish scream or the study that Betty White typed up after awaking from a dream?????

I personally have not seen their study, but I do know that they publicly announced that they were going after fishermen for using hooks which inflict pain on every fish caught.

Reply to
Spike

Reply to
Wound Up

Ohhhhhh The voice of the michaelanderson's bitch is heard! Sorry, I thought it was that other jerk, not you that was his butt buddy, my mistake.

KJK

: > His alter ego. : > Or the end result of Rich and that weirdo (which will remain unnamed) up : > north breeding. : >

: > KJK : >

: > : : > : : > : : >

: >

Reply to
KJ.Kate

Reply to
cprice

Reply to
Michael Seeley

Reply to
Wound Up

They are one and the same Jim. Just do a quick source check of the two posters and you'll see it right away. He is busy in a digital camera group right now making a fool of himself. He is quite the trolling idiot. He thinks everyone in ramfm is back woods hillbillies or rednecks according to his posts there. My advice is for everyone to ignore him or kill file him. IMO, he is more obnoxious than my dear friend Hanky. ;)

Reply to
Michael Johnson, PE

ROFL!! Well, both.

Reply to
WindsorFox

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.