PCV valve...?

anyone have a PCV valve for a V-8? I have a '63 V-8 in my '55 and the PCV valve has lost its "valve" function, either a good used replacement or a part number for a modern equivalent would be fine...

thanks

nate

Reply to
Nate Nagel
Loading thread data ...

I am in the same boat. I brought mine back to life last year but it should be replaced. the flaps(napa) spent some time with me and searched their old parts book. blank. any takers?

Reply to
am not r2

I have one in my tool box marked PCV134. Not sure if it is the right one, though.

Chip

Reply to
cjdaytonjrnospam

Nate,

2-bbl. or 4-bbl?

Jim Bradley '64 Daytona HT "Rerun" Remove HAT to reply

Nate Nagel wrote:

Reply to
Jim Bradley
4-barrel, although the parts book does not discriminate.

nate

Jim Bradley wrote:

Reply to
Nate Nagel

Use the road tube.... Legal for 1955 and simple to maintain.

JT

Reply to
Grumpy AuContraire

The backflow valve prevents a manifold backfire from entering the crankcase and even if there is some small leakage at the valve when blowing back through the valve it will still shut off during a backfire episode. If the backflow valve function is all that's wrong with it it will still function to evacuate the crankcase.

The Purolator number I have for the '63 V8 PCV valve is PV-1029. This is the straight valve using three separate hoses.

The Purolator number for the late '63 and '64 valve is PV-666 (devil worshipers?), this is the elbow type using two hoses. This is also reportedly available from NAPA, their number is 2-815.

Reply to
John Kunkel

Thanks, this is very helpful!

FWIW I also have a NAPA part number for the R-engine valve that screws into the carb from a similar thread that I started over on the SDC web site. Once I verify these numbers they'll all be going into the list on my web site...

nate

Reply to
N8N

Nate,

With the AFB and Edelbrock 4-bbls, I have used NAPA Echlin 29267. This is the one that screws into the base of the carb, and has a hose barb on the other end.

Jim Bradley '64 Daytona "Rerun" Remove HAT to reply

N8N wrote:

Reply to
Jim Bradley

Reply to
Oujdeivß

I'll disagree since a road tube provides for passive ventilation which is always adequate. It is also simple as the PCV system of non R series Stude engines leaves much to be desired. Give me the simple option every time.

JT

Oujdeivß wrote:

Reply to
Grumpy AuContraire

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.