End of Lease: buy out, or turn it in?

I'm coming up on the end of a lease on my 2000 Outback next month. I'm trying to decide if it makes better financial sense to purchase the car at that time, or to turn it in and start afresh with yet another lease. I should say upfront that I'm not the pride-of-ownership type -- renter vs. owner mentality -- but I don't want that to cloud sound fiscal choices.

Any suggestions on how to proceed to make this decision? There are quite a few variables I can see coming into play here. Any way to simplify the anaysis?

Perhaps it boils down to this: If I can get the same or better deal (i.e., monthly payment, based on mileage allowance, downpayment, etc.) that I have on this lease, why not go for a new lease? It certainly eliminates the unknowns of vehicle repair, etc., that go with ownership.

I can provide more specific details (payments/mileage/etc.) if that helps, but for now I thought I'd lob the broader question out to you all first.

Thanks in advance for your suggestions, Liz

Reply to
Liz Dawrs
Loading thread data ...

"Liz Dawrs" wrote

Dominic had some good points. Another thing to look at is the used car market right now. Unless you really want to keep your car, see if you can sell it privately for more than the residual value before you have to turn it in. That will give you a nice deposit on your new car. Also, this is unlikely, but if the residual is really low, you could even take it to a different dealer and see what they will give you for it in trade.

Brian

Reply to
Brian

The only problem is that it is not her car to sell. The car belongs whoever she leases from.

Even if she could sell it, it is rare that the residual value is less that the actual car value.

Reply to
Tiburon27

"Tiburon27" wrote

The leasing company either wants the car back or the money. They don't care about what you do with the car after they get their money. Its slightly more complicated than selling a privately owned car, but its possible. There's just an extra step while you wait for them to fax you a release note.

True, the leasing companies are pretty good at predicting the residual value in the market. However it couldn't hurt to try.

Brian

Reply to
Brian

Actually it all depends on the contract between you and the lessor. If the contract says you can sell it and pay out a given amount, you can, if it explicitly excludes it, you obviously can't. Hence, always read the print.

Reply to
PlaneGuy

Easiest answer is that if you buy a vehicle, at some point it is paid for, hence no monthly payments. For people that buy a good quality vehicle, this makes economic sense because repair bills will likely be much lower than lease payments for a fairly long period of time. Also, you can modify or buy accessories for an owned vehicle, like a better stereo or something, but you wouldn't do that with a lease. As far as a Subaru Outback, you are likely able to own and run one up to

100,000 miles relatively trouble free.

In my opinion, leasing is a waste of money.

Reply to
L. Kreh

Good points in this, and the others' posts.

At this point, I'm leaning toward buying the car. Other than a few scratches, it's in great shape, has been maintenance-free (except for an annoying go-round with an ill-fitting inner door panel...grrr), and at 3 year old, has under 30K miles on it. Since I'd probably end up buying a late-model used car anyway, why not go with a known quantity?

My one thought was that, living in Southern California, the AWD is a bit over the top, and I'd probaby be content with a more economical Honda, but I do appreciate the AWD on those snowy trips to Mammoth (and the occasional rain-slicked day on the oily freeways).

Thanks again, everyone, for your suggestions. Much appreciated!

Reply to
Liz Dawrs

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.