Dwell angle, electronic ignition

Clearly you never had a Ford from the mid/late 70's or mid 80's or late

90's/early 00's. Ford seems to screw up an electronic ignition system about every 10 years - first the aluminum box things on the firewalls, then the modules inside the distributors and most recently coil packs on 5.4L V8s. I've personally been lucky, one coil pack and I think the dealer screwed it up when he changed the plugs, but my pareants had the aluminum case ignition module fail on a '78 Ford and the internal distributor module fail on a 86 Ranger. Neither failure was expensive, or even particularly time consuming, but they were annoying. Those potted aluminum ignition modules were so bad, most car parts places just had them under the counter to hand out. Of course by the mid 80's they got those bullet-proof, so they switched to a little modules inside the distributor and it took another 5 years to get those right, at which point they switched to something else. At least since about 2001, I think Ford has managed to avoid a new ignition module / coil pack problem, but I suppose it has been 10 years, so maybe they'll screw up something new this year or next. Of course comapred to the crap VW sells, anything looks good. To be honest, most modern ignition systems are so good, you are shocked when one fails. I've never actually been left on the side of the road by an ignition failure (even back to old point type systems) although in the old days, I did have performance conerns related to ignition systems.

Ed

Reply to
C. E. White
Loading thread data ...

formatting link

Reply to
AMuzi

Hah... no, I've owned exactly one Ford ('93 pickup) in my life, and don't think I ever regularly drove any others. However, it seems that I'm getting a new one because of some fleet management shift at work... so we'll see. (fingers crossed.) Last company car it was the water pump failing catastrophically... dunno what the typical Ford failures are :)

nate

Reply to
Nate Nagel

Any brand of car you care to name has horror stories. Mine mostly involve VWs and Toyotas. My parents always bought Fords. I've been more diverse in my purchases (name a major lower cost brand, and either I've had it or someone close to me has - except nothing Korean). I've never had a truly unreliable Ford, although I did have a 78 Fairmont that must have been painted on a Saturday night by someone under the influence of something. The Ford trucks we have had for our farm have always been reliable. The ignition module in my Father 86 Ranger was about as bad as it got. My first wife had a 89 Taurus wagon that went to hell after we got divorced, but then the Toyota she drove before that was a smoking turd that was ready for the junk yard at 60k miles (worst car ever!). For the most part cars are much much better now than they were 30 years ago (or even 15). I sometimes get the bug to buy an old Mustang or Camaro or even something British (TR-6 for instance). But then I remember I lived through those once already and they weren't that good. I loved the 280Z I had in 1975, but then I remember the problems it had and I think I should just stick with newer stuff. I had a

1992 F150 with the 300 Six. I drove it for 14 years and the only expense worth mentioning was a new fuel pump in year 14 (and even then the truck ran fine, but the check valve in the pump leaked, so if it sat for a few days, it would be slow to start). I actually prefer that 1992 truck to my 2009, but then I made a mistake when I bought the 2009 and got one with too much fluff. The truck is too nice for trashing on the farm (not that that stops me).

Ed

Reply to
C. E. White

Inductance has no bearing on final current. It heads for infinity or until you cut it loose. It's the RESISTANCE that limits the current. And it's usually small enough that you can smoke the coil in short order. That's why there's often a ballast resister in series wit the coil on a point's system.

The spark timing depends on when the points open. The energy in the coil depends on the current at the time that happens. You could probably measure what you've got in the current system vs. RPM.

A CD ignition works differently. It charges a cap and dumps it into the coil at spark time. I don't think dwell has much bearing on the system.

First task is to decide EXACTLY what's broke. If you're unwilling to poke instrumentation under the hood, you've got a significant handicap.

This is going to turn out like most projects. 99.9% trivial, and 0.1% expensive development failures. You're out of your element and must learn what the auto guys spent the last 100 years figuring out. Make sure the hood is well out of the way when you're under there. You don't want to rip a big gash in your head when you get shocked and come flying out of there. Don't ask me how I know.

33 years might be old enough that you won't go to jail for tampering with the ECU. Depends on where you live.

I feel your pain. $350 will buy a few rounds of golf or dinners out. But what's the cost of being stranded on the mountain in a snow storm. Or in a bad part of town at Midnight. Or missing your plane.

Before I jumped, I'd look into after-market CD ignition conversions and see what's available. Might be easier to start with something with a tested/reliable high voltage/current side and interface that to your sensor on the low voltage/current side. Also, check the DEQ to see if it's legal for your vehicle.

Reply to
mike

AMuzi wrote in news:jnuadn$rjt$ snipped-for-privacy@dont-email.me:

THis is the exact one I have used for years to use any ign module on almost any vehicle. KB

formatting link
*listing*title

Reply to
Kevin Bottorff

jim beam wrote in news:jnu4rn$70u$ snipped-for-privacy@speranza.aioe.org:

since you know nothing about him of course your qualified to criticize him. You just can`t stand not being a blowhard can you?? KB

Reply to
Kevin Bottorff

what do i need to know other than what he writes kev? did you bother to read it kev? or should i say, could you understand it kev? the evidence says "no".

as opposed to what kev? your and your, um, "contributions" to the knowledge pool?

Reply to
jim beam

that's not much of an endorsement...

Reply to
jim beam

inductance most /definitely/ has a bearing on current all the way up to saturation. and inductance /definitely/ had a bearing on time to saturation..

see above.

it's called a "kettering" system.

no, you're ignoring the core.

????

why does everyone keep bleating about cdi's? hardly anyone uses them except a few outdated aftermarket systems, and even those manufacturers quietly offer inductive systems as well because they know the reality,

why? why? why? cdi doesn't work as well. and why do so many people think electronic ignitions are all capacitive???

and just use an inductive retrofit module. chances are the o.p. can pick one up for a few bucks, and won't even have to change their coil. cdi requires coil change, so that's even more expense on top of the hundreds spent on aftermarket that won't work as well because it doesn't deliver as much energy.

why? why? why? just replace the module and retain the other stock [inductive] components.

Reply to
jim beam

Okay, I got "The Doctor's Step By Step Guide to Optimizing your Ignition" which was $3 at thriftbooks.com.

It's not good but not bad. It does flog some of Jacobs' products, but less than you'd expect for a book like this. It has some interesting and useful stuff like his method for estimating horsepower on the road which is really kind of ingenious.

It has a lot of advice in it that is good advice but is not backed up with proper explanations of any sort. His basic electricity introduction is misleading and doesn't include some of the stuff that is needed for some of his later discussions. It also has some advice that seems a little suspicious to me.

It has basically zero information about what is really going on inside the box.

On the other hand, some of the empirical "I tried this and it worked and I tried this and it didn't" could be very useful.

And, the discussion of reading sparkplugs (and how reading sparkplugs for performance tuning is not really as useful as it used to be) is very very good and makes a lot of points that people seem to ignore today.

So, I'd give it a 2/5. I'd give the TAB book by Brant a 2/5 also, but the information in the Brant book is a lot more detailed about what goes on inside the box. Either one is well worth $3 on thriftbooks.

--scott

Reply to
Scott Dorsey

snipped-for-privacy@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in news:jqt2r7$4g2$ snipped-for-privacy@panix2.panix.com:

Good, and my point was any box you get your hands on you can use as per Jocobs instructions. much cheeper than reinventing the wheel, unless you want a elect project. KB

Reply to
Kevin Bottorff

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.