What could go wrong with an '87 Supra?

This ad caught my eye:

1987 Toyota Supra 80k original - $5200 Very Clean Naturally Aspirated Toyota Supra with just over 80,000 original km. Car has never seen a real winter. Shipped from BC. Body in very good condition, mechanically sound vehicle. Safety Test passed, no need for e-test since car is made in 1987. Air Conditioning blows cold Completely Stock. No mods. Hate to sell this gem, but need a bigger vehicle.

My '78 Trans Am is about done for. It would be nice to drive something from this millennium, but that ad sounds intriguing. Were the normally- aspirated ones bad for head gaskets?

Reply to
Ed Treijs
Loading thread data ...

Okay, that's a bad sign.

Eww. I changed the head gasket (and later the head) on my '87 Reliant, but hey if I screwed up, there were plenty of 2.5L engines in the junkyard. '87 Supra engines, not so much.

The ad carefully avoids mentioning which transmission. I'd prefer a manual, actually.

Looks like it.

Canadian. Car's in Toronto.

formatting link
While I would like to get a relatively inexpensive, interesting car to replace my interesting (if terminally rusty and leaking) Trans Am, I'm not sure I want to rush into a new learning experience with a new kind of (for me) quirky car. I suppose that there are enough Toyota fans in Toronto to snap this one up.

It's just that:

  1. BC car--no rust--good luck finding that with Ontario cars; how many unrusty '87 Toyotas exist in Canada east of the Alberta/BC border?
  2. Stock--geez is someone going ruin it by putting on 19" rims, a stupid exhaust, clear markers, and a crappy primered body kit?

....Ed

Reply to
Ed Treijs

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.