So a straight 8-cylinder engine has its pistons arranged equally about 360 degrees - ie one every 45 degrees? And a V engine has them *effectively* at the same spacing, if you allow for the angle of the V. Fair enough - makes sense. Given this, I've always wondered why 4-cylinder engines don't have the cylinders every 90 degrees, instead of two at 0 degrees and two at 180 degrees. Would it cause even more vibration if successive cylinders counting from one end were at 0, 90, 270 and 180 degrees rather than 0, 180, 180 and
0? Either way you avoid a travelling wave of vibration (0, 90, 180, 270 or 0, 0, 180, 180 would be a Bad Thing!).One other thing. Someone mentioned radial engines, as used in aeroplanes. Am I right I thinking that some radial engines had the propeller attached to the engine block and rotated all the cylinders about a stationary crankshaft that was attached to the fuselage? Have I really understood that correctly? If so, you'd think that getting the fuel fed through what is effectively a commutator (in electric motor terms) from stationary fuel supply in the fuselage would have been a little bit tricky, even if you had rotating carburettors and separate exhaust pipes for each cylinder. Why did they do it this way rather than having the cylinders fastened to the fuselage and rotaing the crankshaft and propeller?