Camry 2007 V6 - Fuel Economy in the City

The official EPA numbers for Camry 2007 V6 with the 3.5 Liter engine is

31 miles per gallon on a highway and 22 in the city.

For Honda Accord V6 with the 3.0L engine the numbers are 29 and 20 respectively.

Is Camry really that economical? What are the real numbers it gets in the city? I have to drive in the city traffic most of the time, so the "city" number is the one I am most concerned about.

Thanks.

Reply to
success_ny
Loading thread data ...

Today a frend came by with his brand new 07 Camry. It has a four banger. He said he got 36 Mpg on a trip and thinks he's getting about

28 in town. It is a nice car, very well appointed and rides very nice. He said it is very peppy.
Reply to
".,dbu',

I cannot speak for the 2007 Camry since I have not driven yet, but the last

60 or 70 new Toyotas that I have driven for at least 1,000 miles have all gotten equal or better than the city and highway EPA.

As far as the difference in EPA figures between the Camry and the Accord, the methodology for determining EPA mileage estimates is pretty inflexible, using special test gas, running the vehicle at a specified ambient temperature on a dynamometer, etc. so while the EPA figures are reflective of a very steady driving style, the differences between models will be relative. IOW, there is a good possibility that the Camry will get better mileage than the Accord.

Reply to
Ray O

i have a 99 camry v6 since new.

160,000 miles

origional spark plugs.\

easy driving city 20 mpg.

Ray O wrote:

Reply to
wp51dos

just picked up my new 07 le with a four banger and it goes gooooood. Traded a Monte Carlo in on it and it is quicker.

Reply to
BigJIm

I have 2007 Camry SE V6 and it is just as advertised. Around 30 mph on highways (my number could be low because I'm a speed demon, I go

90mph on highways, so if you drive 65 mph your number will improve.) In city I notice I get around 21-24.

Have fun with it, I know I like mine.

Reply to
Big Blue

New 2007 LEV6 approx 28 in city, 36-37 on the hiway. This is based on the larger Imp. gal. Numbers would be lower in US gal. I drive about

110 K/hr on hi-way with a/c on as required. I love the car, first Toyota I have had.

rq

Reply to
QQQQ

36-37 on highway? Do you drive 55 mph? That is impossible, you must have done your math wrong.

Ok, now it makes sense. Translation to US Gallons: 30-32.

62 mph driver, makes sense for such good mileage. Remember kids, optimal miles per gallon is 55-65 mph. Then again why the hell do you want a V6 if all you want to do is drive 55-65?
Reply to
Big Blue

I think it was Big Blue who stated:

'Cause it's SMOOOOOOTH. (We didn't like ANY of the fours we test drove, compared to the V6 -- Accord, Buick, Camry, or Maxima.)

'Cause it gets to 65 FASTER than a four when it needs to.

'Cause it's SMOOOOOOTH.

'Cause it can merge more easily than a four in heavy traffic.

'Cause it's SMOOOOOOTH.

'Cause it can cruise all day at 75-80 if that's what we want.

'Cause it's SMOOOOOOTH.

'Cause it can tow more than a four.

'Cause it's SMOOOOOOTH.

'Cause it's quieter than a four . . .

. . . 'cause it's SMOOOOOOTH.

-Don (need any other reasons?)

Reply to
Don Fearn

Again, waste of money on V6 if all you gonna do is drive 55-65 mph.

1.2 seconds. Congrats on $5,000 USD extra well-spent on saving 1.2 seconds on reaching 65 mph.

At 65 mph? Please.

But the problem is you drive only 55-65.

If you are using Camry to tow anything you're in trouble.

Not true.

Sane and logical ones if possible.

Reply to
Big Blue

I think it was Big Blue who stated:

Smoother, quieter, and more powerful than a four. Those fit the "sane and logical" per your request. What else need be said?

Reply to
Don Fearn

1) V6 and 4-cylinder vehicles are the same in noise (so no V6 is not quieter) 2) V6 and 4-cylinder are the same in "smoothness" unless of course you "floor-it", but since your max speed is 65mph I doubt you "floor-it" much. 3) More powerful is definitely true. But all that power goes to waste when you drive only max at 65mph.

Conclusion: you made an illogical, insane choice to buy V6.

Of course this is free world, do whatever you want. Who am I to stop you from wasting thousands of dollars.

Reply to
Big Blue

I think it was Big Blue who stated:

Yes, a V6 IS quieter. In EVERY car we test drove this was true. EVERY car. A four has to rev higher and work harder than a V6 in any vehicle. Higher revs and harder work mean more noise, and some of that noise gets back to the vehicle inhabitants.

No, a V6 is inherently smoother than an inline four because of its layout. Also, a four is working harder . . . see above . . . so I don't have to "floor-it" as much. AND, my butt told me each V6 we test drove was smoother than the four in EVERY car. EVERY one.

Hardly. It means quicker acceleration to that speed. And more power to get to faster speeds when they are called for (like on freeways when the rest of the traffic is moving faster and I match their speeds for my safety).

To you, maybe. After we got done test driving all those cars with fours and V6s it was clear to us that the V6 was the way to go for the reasons I cited above. A little more expense and a little less economy was worth the trade-off. Logically.

Have you ever compared a four and a V6 back-to-back in the same vehicle?

-Don (making a logical, well thought-out choice)

-- Pooder approved this post . . . .

Reply to
Don Fearn

I think it was Big Blue who stated:

Oh yeah, I should mention that we got a Camry SE V6 with a larger, higher-output V6 than any other Camry has!

That oughta make you REALLY question our sanity!!

-Don (doing crazy things since 1953)

-- Pooder approved this post . . . .

Reply to
Don Fearn

You said you had LE V6 and now it's SE V6? Make up your mind already. Which one you got?

Reply to
Big Blue

I think it was Big Blue who stated:

I NEVER said LE.

I ONLY said SE.

Learn to read for UNDERSTANDING.

Let me know if you figure it out; the answer is right there in front of you.

-- Pooder approved this post . . . .

Reply to
Don Fearn

Damn you are an idiot or a dick.

Here is the orig>New 2007 LEV6 approx 28 in city, 36-37 on the hiway.

36-37 on highway? Do you drive 55 mph? That is impossible, you must have done your math wrong.

Ok, now it makes sense. Translation to US Gallons: 30-32.

62 mph driver, makes sense for such good mileage. Remember kids, optimal miles per gallon is 55-65 mph. Then again why the hell do you want a V6 if all you want to do is drive 55-65?

______________________

Notice it says LEV6, now, I always assumed you are rq just posting in another name "Don." However, now it seems like you are not rq but shamelessly jumps right into a conversation without any context.

You need attention that much huh? Homeless shelter too boring?

Reply to
Big Blue

I think it was Big Blue who stated:

Assumed.

Shamelessly.

Heh, heh, heh . . . pretty funny, Mr Blue.

It's a Usenet tradition to jump in to a conversation; that's how this medium works.

The context was an assertion you made in this very public place. I took issue with it. Then you made the assumption and shamelessly ranted . . . .

It was amusing, though. Thanx.

-- Pooder approved this post . . . .

Reply to
Don Fearn

you butt into a private conversation for no reason but act like an idiot. I should of known better.

Illogical sense of humor, like the way you throw money away. Like I said, unfortunately freedom means idiots like you get to throw thousands away for stupid reasons.

Reply to
Big Blue

And why would I respond with another name as you "assumed". Did I say something that I should be ashamed of or is it just your over active imagination at work.

Let me say that the idea that someone shouldn't buy a V6 because they only drive 65 mph, which by the way is the legal limit on a great many of our high-ways, is so stupid that I don't know where to start. Try passing on a mountain road with your little piss ant 4cyc and we can all gather and scrap you off some 18 wheeler's grill.

rq rq rq

Reply to
QQQQ

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.