Hi, I have a 1989 Corolla SR5 coupe, 146k miles, California emissions, meticulously maintained, looks and runs great. Would appreciate your thoughts on a needed exhaust job:
I bought it in '99 at 90k miles. It had just come from California (I live in Boston) and had its original exhaust system. Starting in 2001 I did a lot of short-distance driving, and the muffler rotted out in
6/2002 at 120k miles. Took it to one of those "foreign auto experts" shops which replaced the muffler with one that looked like the OEM one though was not OEM (in retrospect, wish I did it at the Toyota dealership for warranty purposes, but was afraid to spend the extra $ at the time).Continued to drive lots of short-distances. In 1/2004 at 130k miles, the pipe leading to the muffler (midpipe) broke through completely. Was desperate to get it fixed quickly so took it to an independent shop down the street, and was surprised/dismayed later to find that the mechanic had replaced the mid-pipe and muffler with a cheap quality "one piece cat back exhaust."
Now at 146k miles the muffler is shot again (and unfortunately it's in one piece with the "cat back exhaust" as described above). My options are:
- Toyota dealership-- when I called and told them the car has a non-OEM one-piece exhaust system on it, they said that if I want the exhaust system replaced with OEM dealership parts, that I'd need to replace the catalytic converter too. So, they recommended I not do it at the dealership. Even if the dealership could do it, would be concerned about the cost, esp. given the age of the car.
- ask an independent shop to replace it with a 1-piece exhaust system like it has now, as this is probably the cheapest option
- ask an independent shop to replace it with separate midpipe and muffler, if they are able to do this, so that future repairs will be easier; suspect this may be expensive
- last and unlikely option-- see if a shop can just cut out and replace the muffler part of the 1-piece assembly on the car right now.
The Corolla is in good shape but is feeling its age and costing about $1000/year in repairs (driven about 4k-5k miles a year), so I'm trying to limit how much I put into it, esp as I just put $450 into a couple months ago for something else. It's probably more cost effective to buy a newer used car, but the '89 has some sentimental value and I'd like to hold onto it for a couple more years.
Anyhow, sorry for all the verbiage-- which of the above options would you recommend I pursue, in terms of a good compromise between cost and quality of repair?
Thanks, John