Made in America?

Excerpts from

formatting link
By a crucial measure, the Toyota Sienna is far more American than the Ford Mustang. Only 65% of the content of a Mustang comes from the US or Canada. The Sienna is assembled in Indiana with 90% local components.

There's more than a little irony in this, considering Ford has launched a campaign to regain its footing with an appeal to patriotism. "Americans really do want to buy American brands," asserted Ford Executive VP Mark Fields in a recent speech. "We will compete vigorously to be America's car company."

As the Mustang shows, though, it's no longer easy to define what is American. The result is a brewing public-relations war, with both sides wrapping themselves in the Stars and Stripes. Toyota has been running commercials touting its contribution to the areas of the US economy where it has built factories.

On Thursday, the Level Field Institute, a grass-roots organization founded by US Big Three retirees, is scheduled to hold a news conference in Washington. Among the points the group is expected to make is its belief that comparing relative North American component content is an ineffective way to determine who is "more American" among auto makers. A better way, says Jim Doyle who heads Level Field, is to look at the number of jobs each auto maker creates per car sold in the US.

Mr. Doyle says the institute's study shows that Toyota in 2005 employed roughly three times more US workers per car sold in the US than Hyundai Motor Co. Each of the Big Three manufacturers in the same year employed roughly three times as many US workers as Toyota, on a per-car-sold basis. "What's better for the American economy?" Mr. Doyle asks. "A GM car built in Mexico with 147,000 jobs back here in America, or a Honda built in Alabama with 4,000 or 5,000 jobs in America?"

GM is importing Korean-made cars to sell under the Chevy nameplate. Japanese car makers are using American designers for cars being sold in China. Some of the high-end BMW "imports" are made in South Carolina.

That said, the Japanese manufacturing presence in the US is growing. Foreign-based auto makers in the US, led by the Japanese, account for

1.7% of US manufacturing jobs. After $28 billion in cumulative North America investment - and annual purchases of parts reaching $45 billion or more in recent years - 67% of the Japanese-brand cars now sold in North America are made in North America.
Reply to
Steve
Loading thread data ...

OK, this WSJ article is suspect. The "Big Three" ceased to exist long ago, and there certainly wasn't a "Big Three" back in 2005. There is a "Big TWO" now, if anything. Big Three used to refer to the three DOMESTIC automakers, namely GM, Ford and Chrysler. But one of them is a German company now, Daimler Chrysler, or some such. You can't buy a domestic vehicle under the Chrysler nameplate, so to refer to "the Big Three" at all in the year 2006 is a terrible mistake, unless you are writing some kind of historical piece. Makes me wonder about all the other supposed facts referenced in the article. -Dave

Reply to
Mike T.

Yeah, you should be a WSJ fact finder!

Reply to
Dan J.S.

The Big Three now are GM, Ford and Toyota. DXC is in fourth place.

Reply to
Jim Higgins

Dear Sir; You're a lyin' sack of shit!

You just closed the plant here, probably to "create" new jobs in Mexico. Good riddance, hope you can sell them there, also.

ps: have to give ya points for Humanitarian progress in Mexico. When workers tried to unionize, you fired All of them...then rehired them at much lower wages. That's progress....haven't heard of "disappearing" union organizers, like at your plants in Argentina, back in the 70's.

Reply to
Jon von Leipzig

Check this out from the Onion:

Illegal immigrants returning to Mexico for American jobs

formatting link

Reply to
Jim Higgins

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.