Then it wasn't about her being a burden to the husband, it was about her husband doing what she wanted.
Then it wasn't about her being a burden to the husband, it was about her husband doing what she wanted.
That's a tough concept for some people to follow, even for people who have put those instructions in writing for doctor and family.
Yeah, right...
Are you 100% positive that your opinions on this issue are objective?
Did she have those instructions in writing?
Are you going to ever say something that doesn't have a question mark attached to it?
I don't recall. But, I honestly don't think it would've mattered, considering the political and religious horseshit surrounding the case.
Yeah, right. If he was just being selfish, we would of just let the parents deal with it and he could of just washed his hands of it. He chose to fight for his wife. Regardless, it's still none of your's or the government's business.
They didn't have a living will. If she did, there would not have been this big controversy. People are taken off life support all the time. Some because of a living will and some because everybody in the family agree it's best. In this case there was no living will and the husband and parents disagreed on removing life support, hence the mess.
And that you can't answer her question cause you don't have a clue to what your talking about.
---------------------------------------------------- OK sure whatever. You have the final word.
But it doesn't address my point, at all.
Cathy
Exploitation. As it stands now IVF involves super ovulation. It's very easy to jump to creating embryos. Now, I must really get back to my bread. It's calling me ;)
Tom, the only thing I typed was, "the crux of the matter is". That's all, everything else is quoted. I do agree however with the quoted. Why spend taxpayer money on this? Why not george soros and some of his rich buddies fund it. This will be vetoed again which will buy more time to find a better more lasting solution.
I wish you wouldn't get so upset, life is too short.
No she did not.
Her parents wanted to take care of her.
The only 'instructions' were relayed by her husband.
Joe, the legend in his own mind?
Nah....
IVF should NEVER be paid for from taxpayers' money. We need less population, not more.
Surely, for anyone with any emotional health at all, it is far from being easy.
Well, there is a reason for using public money. OTOH, USians of a certain political stripe have such a profound abhorrence of any public involvement in private life that I hesitate to mention it. If public money is used to fund an invention, presumably it could then be patented for the public good, rather than to enrich (say) this "george soros" (who is not someone I know) and his mates.
Hmmm. Good bread. I'm unhappy to say it didn't rise as well as I expected it would. Back to the drawing board. Have a nice day.
did you use fresh yeast and warm water?
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.