OT: Mitt Romney in the drivers seat!

If Romney does not win the nomination then whoever does would be stupid not to pick him as their VP mate. He can pick up key states and especially with his Mormon following. I am an ex-Mormon btw but have tremendous respect for many of the LDS that I know.

``````````````````````````

formatting link

BOSTON (AP) - Forget the national polls for Mitt Romney.

Slowly, methodically, the Republican presidential contender has seized the advantage in the early states that count, relying on a solid organization, $4 million in advertising and an aggressive approach.

It's propelled him to the top of polls in the caucus and primary sites of Iowa and New Hampshire, and laid the foundation for what some analysts argue is greater success.

"Mitt Romney is now positioned as the front-runner for the nomination," said Scott Reed, who managed Bob Dole's 1996 presidential campaign. "There's a long way to go, but to date he's running the most logical, thought-out, structured campaign. He's marching in the right cadence, he's raising the money, he's spending it wiser and he seems to be on track."

Romney continues to trail former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Sen. John McCain of Arizona and even former Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee - who has yet to formally declare his candidacy - in national polls of the Republican contenders.

But recent surveys show the former Massachusetts governor leading in the first states to vote, bolstering his strategy of using momentum from strong showings in Iowa and New Hampshire to push him ahead in South Carolina and Florida a week later. In rapid-fire succession, at least 15 states from New York to California hold contests Feb. 5 that will likely produce the GOP nominee.

The path is far from easy for Romney, who has been dogged by criticism that he has switched positions on abortion, embryonic stem cell research and gay rights - issues critical with GOP conservatives. He also is vying to become the first Mormon president, a potential problem with Southern evangelicals who consider the faith a cult.

And then there's Massachusetts, a state well-known for its liberal tradition, which may be a particularly hard sell in conservative circles. Romney's resume there is thin - just one term as governor.

Romney was campaigning in Iowa this weekend, his 11th trip to the lead caucus state and among the most of any candidate. Romney has also outpaced his rivals with eight visits to neighboring New Hampshire, where he has a summer home, and 10 to South Carolina, another state where he just won a straw poll among Republican women.

Unlike others, though, Romney is now on his second and third meetings with top political leaders in the early voting states. His "Ask Mitt Anything" town hall meetings with the public have become a campaign trail staple. He's also not above stroking local egos, praising Iowans and New Hampshire residents for their close scrutiny of the candidates and arguing that their states should remain the first to vote.

"The aggressiveness, the early aggressiveness, was a huge boon to him," said Chuck Laudner, executive director of the Republican Party of Iowa. "They sent a DVD out in the mail, glossy fliers. It cemented him as a front-runner here in Iowa in April and May. They didn't just come here at the end of the process like the others."

Reed said Romney's organizational strength is the primary reason Giuliani and McCain decided to skip the Aug. 11 Iowa straw poll, a political beauty contest that Romney and his team had targeted.

Romney has pummeled the early states with TV advertising, part of an unprecedented $4 million early buy fueled by a record $21 million he raised during the first three months of the year. That total far surpassed Giuliani's $13.6 million and McCain's $12.5 million, a pecking order the Romney camp hopes to repeat when the second quarter ends June 30.

His campaign is organizing a second "National Call Day" this month at the TD Banknorth Garden, where the Boston Bruins and Celtics play, so supporters can seek donations within their business and social circles. The first day, in January, raised $6.5 million. The campaign has also scheduled a barbecue at Fenway Park, home of the Boston Red Sox, as part of its fundraising plan.

A former venture capitalist, Romney also could tap some of his own personal wealth. With assets of between $190 million and $250 million, he is the wealthiest candidate in the field.

"I think you reap what you sow, and Governor Romney has been running the most traditional campaign in New Hampshire for the longest time," said Fergus Cullen, chairman of the New Hampshire Republican State Committee.

"They're following the path that was walked by John McCain in 1999," Cullen added. "If you look back at George Bush's loss in 2000 (in the New Hampshire primary), you can trace it back to his decision to blow off the Dartmouth College debate in the fall of 1999. That sent a message that he didn't believe he had to do all the things that the others were doing."

Romney is operating on the notion that he can win the GOP nomination if he starts small and his momentum grows. That is why he has been so dismissive of national polling, where he lags, and buoyed by the state-by-state surveys, where he has led.

Earlier this month in an interview with The Associated Press, Romney explained his strategy.

"I think the national polls are largely name awareness at this stage," he said, "but as time goes on, name awareness is replaced by 'does the message connect' and 'have you built a good grass-roots organization' and 'have you raised enough money to get out there?'"

Reply to
GO Mavs
Loading thread data ...

He's about the only choice who's prominent enough to do the GOP ticket some good, and unlike Giuliani and McCain, he'd accept the VP spot.

Have you ever noticed that most people who consider LDS a cult belong to religions that used to approve of slavery, something that LDS has never done?

Reply to
larry moe 'n curly

The LDS history is a unique one to the United States. While every religion and people have some parts of the past they regret, I do respect the culture and also its emphasis on the importance of family.

Reply to
GO Mavs

In message news:y5Ldi.4507$%t6.4201@trnddc02, GO Mavs sprach forth the following:

Wow talk about a kiss of death.

Reply to
Fred Garvin, Male Prostitute

But they did, at one time, refuse blacks entry to their priesthood. A restriction that was removed only when their tax status was threatened. Their president received a well-timed revelation that blacks were now permitted.

Reply to
witfal

It had nothing to do with tax status because a church can be exempt from taxation despite its racial policies.

Reply to
larry moe 'n curly

It had nothing to do with tax status and everything to do with their religious beliefs. Also it wasnt blacks who could not become preist but African Americans who could not become preist.

If you wanted to open an all black church or all chinese church or all white church, then you could do that without the threat of losing tax status.

Its best to be informed when making such statements. The LDS simply carried on the traditional beliefs of the cain curse which many religions removed from their beliefs early on. No religion is free from mistake. Even the Bible itself is imperfect.

Reply to
GO Mavs

Incorrect:

formatting link
The IRS was threatening to remove their tax-exempt status. There are numerous books which also attest to this fact. Have a look at "The Maze of Mormonism", for starters.

Reply to
witfal

Incorrect.

formatting link
Read "The Maze of Mormonism", for enlightenment.

Reply to
witfal

I am not playing your holier than thou game. I don't know what relgion you are but am well aware of anti-Mormon tactics. I don't believe in the gospel of any religion now but I also will not play a role in your mockery of a religion.

The laws in the United States do not bar religions than ban certain races from recieving certain endowments tax exempt status. It has always been that way. The only way a church can lose its temple exempt status is to go political.

With that said, I dont care why they, the Mormons changed their opinion on African Americans recieving the priesthood. They arent the first or the last religion to show racism. I live in the South. I have seen plenty of racism here and still do today.

Reply to
GO Mavs

Again, completely wrong. The church was never threatened by the IRS.

COMPASS: Now up until 1978 I understand Blacks were not allowed to be priests in your Church? GBH: That is correct. Although we have Black members of the Church. They felt that they would gain more in this Church than any other with which they were acquainted and they were members of the Church. In 1978 we (the president of the Church) received a revelation under which all worthy men would receive all the blessings of the Church available to them as well as to any others. So across the world now we are teaching the Gospel to Blacks, Whites, everyone else who will listen.

COMPASS: So in retrospect WAS THE CHURCH WRONG IN THAT?

GBH: NO I DON'T THINK IT WAS WRONG. It, things, various things happened in different periods. There's a reason for them.

also another website that covers the facts of the 1978 change

formatting link

Again, you are spreading misinformation. Maybe something you heard in some anti-mormon book somewhere. The facts remain that the laws have always been churches are tax exempt barring they get involved in politics.

You are making up information in order to mislead. I have seen this a thousand times.

Reply to
GO Mavs

I'm not mocking Mormonism. You can either read the book, or not. Your choice won't dictate one iota of my life, so I don't care. I've given you one of many references. Just don't continue to claim what isn't so.

If you think that laws affect what the IRS does or doesn't do, you're ignorant of their power. A mere threat of the loss of tax exempt status was sufficient for Spencer Kimball to receive his "revelation". Whether or not one believes that revelation to be of divine origin, Kimball knew enough to receive it at the right time.

'Nuff said.

Reply to
witfal

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.