Re: Motortrend article: 100 MPG+ Chevy Volt, GM's "Moon Shot"

Perhaps but that will not change the fact a sporty FWD car is an oxymoron, dummy. LOL

> Sporty FWD car, is an oxymoron. > > And you're a moron. What's your point? > >>> On Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:48:54 -0800 (PST), N8N cast forth these pearls of >>> wisdom...: >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On 5 Feb 2009 17:37:42 -0500, Scott Dorsey cast forth these pearls of >>>>>> wisdom...: >>>>> >>>>>> > They don't. They're starting to get it... but GM currently does not >>>>>> > have >>>>>> > any economy cars worth a damn in their product line. Compare the >>>>>> > Aveo >>>>>> > with >>>>>> > similarly-priced offerings from Toyota and even Hyundai. They look >>>>>> > similar >>>>>> > on paper, but they sure don't drive similarly. >>>>> >>>>>> I don't know why you would say that. They have built such luxury cars >>>>>> as >>>>>> the Park Ave Ultra since the very early 90's that got mid-twenties in >>>>>> the >>>>>> city and over 30 on the highway. At the same time the Grand Am got >>>>>> equal >>>>>> mileage. Two ends of a scale in terms of types of cars - one >>>>>> excellent >>>>>> luxury and the other a fairly sporty car for American tastes. They >>>>>> are by >>>>>> no means the limit of GM's offerings, just two representative >>>>>> examples. >>>>> >>>>> **This is a joke, right? A Grand Ma, sporty? >>>>> >>>>> The Grand Am GT's are very sporty. Especially with the Ram Air hood. >>>>> My >>>>> sister has an '03, and the thing is rather quick too for a 3400. >>>> >>>> It could be fast (in a straight line) as a Corvette and it still >>>> wouldn't be sporty. A FWD midsize family car can't be made "sporty" >>>> by the addition of ugly plastic cladding and red backlighting for the >>>> gauges. A manual transmission option, decent sport seats, and a real >>>> handling suspension would be a good place to start. >>>> >>>> The fact that GM *thinks* that the Grand Am is sporty is also why >>>> people who want sporty cars don't think of GM as an option. >>>> >>> >>> Ah - you landed squarely on my hot button when it comes to the Grand Am >>> GT. >>> The car flat out begged for a standard transmission. It would have been >>> completely fun to drive if it had one. Not to mention that the 3.4L >>> would >>> have been somewhat more impressive with one. Sporty is indeed a >>> definition >>> within one's mind though. I'll allow that some would never consider the >>> Grand Am a sporty car, but many others do. I'm not calling it a sports >>> car, just calling it sporty. Many of us rather enjoy the American >>> version >>> of sporty - a bit of raw muscle, comfort, and a feel that is completely >>> different from the starkest of cars. There are many true sports cars >>> and >>> cars out there that others would consider more sporty than the Grand Am, >>> which are more nimble, smaller, etc. but I wouldn't want to drive one on >>> a >>> daily basis. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> -Mike- >>> snipped-for-privacy@alltel.net >> >> > >
Reply to
Mike Hunter
Loading thread data ...

"Sporty" is not "sports".

Anyway, NOTHING will change the fact that:

a) GM and every other manufacturer warrants the car to the owner, not to the dealer; and

b) you're an asshole.

Reply to
Elmo P. Shagnasty

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.