>
>> >>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 04:40:32 -0700 (PDT), "His Highness the
>>>> TibetanM>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>> On 4/25/2011 9:26 AM, His Highness the TibetanMonkey, the Beach Cruiser >>>>>
>>>>>>> But I rather have you fight Red Light Cameras than Speed Cameras. They
>>>>>>> are more susceptible to tricks and doesn't tame traffic that much. >>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you have one you must have the other... or nothing at all! >>>>>>
>>>>>> False dichotomy fallacy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Better
>>>>>>> yet, remove the signs that were meant to catch drivers not protect the
>>>>>>> people, as you claim to be the case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I made no such claim about signs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me give you my thoughts:
>>>>>
>>>>> Red Light Cameras are meaningless but profitable. Speed Cameras are
>>>>> meaningful and profitable...
>>>>
>>>> Red Light Cameras are meaningful. Anything that inhibits red light
>>>> running is meaningful.
>>>
>>> Simply increasing the yellow on time by one second has been shown to
>>> decrease the most dangerous accidents by over 70%. Red light cameras have
>>> been shown to increase rear end accidents significantly.
>>>
>>
>> So says you, huh?
>
>Just google it. You'll find plenty of evidence, idiot.
Face it Stebie. When 'Concience' and I agree on something, you KNOW you're dead wrong if you're disagreeing.