Camber

Hi Ramva,

My '73 is due for balljoint replacement. It passed the MOT without problems but there is some play at it. I bought a complete set (lowered) when I purchased my disc-brakes, which I obviously still haven't installed yet.

I was wondering since it is a swing axel, the camber on the back is off, like this: /--\ is it a possibility to change the camber in the front too? I see it on some touring race cars and it makes cornering much better. What about a straight (highway) line?? Would it decrease handling?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated, Roger

Reply to
bug '59
Loading thread data ...

Negative camber in the front has the following problems.

  • Uneven tire wear.
  • The tire contact surface on the road is reduced, so the front tires will lock up easier during heavy braking.
  • When the car is braking, the nose dives. When the nose dives, the camber on the front wheels becomes even more negative, so less contact area and even less braking. That is one of the reasons the front is set to positive camber from the factory, under braking, the camber changes and the contact area increases.
  • Increased rate of wear in the outer (smaller) wheel bearings (more percentage on the car's weight shifts on them).
  • You will need to re-set the front end alignment to different than factory specs to make it handle nicely.

I would only consider having negative camber in the front wheels, if:

  • You like to corner fast.
  • You have wider tires than stock.
  • You know how to set the alignment yourself at your own specs determined by trial and error methods. (Generally with negative camber in front you will need less toe-in, or even a bit of toe-out). You might have to tweak the rear alignment toe settings a bit if you like to "race" your car, to get the desirable feel when cornering.

However, with wider tires and careful alignment, some negative in the front will give better cornering performance than stock settings but with a price of increased rate of wear.

Bill Spiliotopoulos, '67 bug.

Reply to
Bill Spiliotopoulos

Thank you Bill. It's a daily driver, so (reading your story) I think it's best to leave it the way it is. I don't think wear on the tires is such a problem. The handling/safety is most important. I was just thinking of it because the back is lowered so the camber is off, while the front is the way it should be. It looks strange/funny.

Thanks again for your explanation Roger

"Bill Spiliotopoulos" schreef in bericht news:f34485$1n3j$ snipped-for-privacy@ulysses.noc.ntua.gr...

Reply to
bug '59

If the back is too low and looks funny, you can raise the back just a bit, not a very difficult task to do yourself. There is plenty of information on how to do it if you google on this newsgroup.

Bill Spiliotopoulos, '67 bug.

Reply to
Bill Spiliotopoulos

Ah, I think I misinformed you :o) (sorry, English in not my native language... as you prob figured)) I like it the way it is in the back. /--\ However, the front is like this I--I and I find that combo odd...

Thanks, Roger

"Bill Spiliotopoulos" schreef in bericht news:f34dtu$2kla$ snipped-for-privacy@ulysses.noc.ntua.gr...

Reply to
bug '59

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.