But not really proven to be fixed.... all the more reason to keep
pointing it out.
And don't get me wrong- Chrysler has a sludge-prone engine too (the 2.7L
v6) But at least they have documented engineering changes that address
the problem, and seem to have corrected it even when maintenance is poor.
And so did Toyota, or people who don't change their oil would have the same
problem in later models.
You've conveniently snipped out my question of why later model cars don't
sludge. Damages your credibility.
So what was the engineering change for Toyota? Chrysler re-worked the
PCV system, changed materials in the timing chain tensioner system, and
increased oil flow in certain areas to reduce peak oil temperatures. I
have heard/read NO similar detailed explanations of the alleged changes
Toyota made. Prove me wrong and find descriptions of the changes in
detail and I'll stop questioning the status of the fix.
No, I didn't snip it out, my response is still quoted above: Its not
proven to be fixed yet, as I still see reports of it in the newsgroups
and still hear references to it as a possible problem on car talk-shows.
Its actually been well documented, reported by owners who have noted the
changes, by Chrysler service techs who post here, and by folks on the
forums dedicated to the 300/LH cars like the ones Bill Putney posts
links to regularly. Raising the hood and noting that a 2005 has a
different PCV system from a 1999 is hardly "anecdotal." Noting the
different part number (and reading TSBs) for parts is not "anecdotal."
I've seen none of that for Toyotas, and yes its true that I haven't
*looked* because I don't care, I would at least expect that those who
own the vehicles would be able to post more than, "Oh that's fixed."
Show me the revised systems and parts, please! I want to know exactly
HOW it was "fixed."
The generalizations some of you are making is most certainly anecdotal. Not
all Japanese cars are well-made, but you guys keep pissing on the our
insistence that Toyota is better at rectifying mistakes. Like you, I can
only go by my own experience, as well as those around me. I don't see any
publication or internet source as being irrefutable. My husband and I have
had very good luck with Toyotas, and see no reason to change now, but we
have not ruled out domestic vehicles in the future.
In the absence of a clear list of engineering changes to rectify said
mistakes, I have my doubts.
Fair enough, but "had good luck with" a brand hasn't been my sole
criterion for purchase. I *never* owned a front-drive Chrysler or GM
product built in the 80s, despite my superb record with a half dozen
Chrysler products from the 60s and 70s (I still own 2 from the 60s, one
from the 70s, and a 49, FWIW). I avoided those because one look
underneath them showed them to be pretty marginally built (except for
bulletproof engines, but that doesn't help if the car falls apart around
the engine). I waited until the 93 model year when the LH platform
rolled out, and bought one even though it was a first-year model because
it was *clearly* better engineered in every way except the engine.
246,820 miles later, I'm still smiling about that choice.
We didn't go by just our luck either, but prior to trying Toyotas, our own
(admittedly limited) gathering of information from others on the subject.
Since doing so, we haven't seen our research proven wrong.
You are correct. I'm still waiting for other-than-anecdotal proof from this
fellow. Even if the great Ray O says something, we're just taking him at
his word (never mind that he's always right... :-))
Well Toyota sure picked up on it quickly. There are some things Toyota
would be better off not copying.
Interestingly, I was listening to Car Talk on NPR this past weekend -
the "Tappet Brothers" even mentioned sludge prone engines when
diagnosing a Toyota that smoked on start-up (I thought they all did
that - at least the ones owned by my neighbors all do - I thought it
was a Toyota feature).
When I look out of my apartment window, I see the space where one of
my former neighbors used to park his Camry. He is gone but the oil
slick that POS left is still with us. Just another reminder that
Toyotas aren't the perfect vehicles that some people seem to think
they are. On the other hand, my SO's 2007 RAV4 is approaching it's one
year anniversary and it has been perfect - it doesn't even smoke on
start-up (but then my 10 month old Fusion which has more miles on the
odometer has been just as perfect).
And I *still* haven't seen any proof from the sludge whiners that Toyota
kept producing cars that did that when the owners neglected changing their
oil. I live in the *now* - sludge whiners should do the same.
How long ago was that?
Again, I have never seen anyone who says Toyotas are perfect; they have just
said that any problems are easily fixed by either (usually) Toyota
themselves, or the individual.
Big difference from the "service" domestic makers provide.
If they don't do an about-face on their customer service, they'll go
It seems you'd like to forget Toyota's past problems. Can you do the
same for Domestic brands? It seems to me that Toyota apologist are
always comparing new Toyotas to domestic cars from the 60's and 70's.
I agree that "new" Toyotas don't have the same sludge problem as was
alleged for certain past engines (Toyota/Lexus 3.0L V-6 1997-2001 and
Toyota 2.2L I-4 1996-2001). Also, I am quite willing to believe that
the people who had problems with sludge did not change there oil every
3000 or 5000 miles. It should be noted that in the past Toyota
specified longer drain intervals (I know they were as long as 10,000
miles in the 80's). Before you completely discount the "sludge
whiners," you, and other Toyota owners, should consider why it seems
certain Toyotas have sludge problems more than other brands (or even
Toyotas from different years and/or with different engines). You
should also consider how harshly Toyota initially treated the "sludge
whiners." Toyotas has repeatedly emphasized the reliability of Toyota
vehicles. Surely you can see why some people might whine when their
supposedly bullet-proof Toyota failed becasue of sludge when it was
treated the same as some old domestic iron. Some Chryslers and VWs
shared the problem, but by and large it was a Toyota-centric problem.
Do you think the people who bought the allegedly sludge prone Toyotas
were especially stupid, or much less likely to do routine maintenance,
than people that bought other cars, or who bought Toyotas from other
periods? Even Toyota Reports...err I mean Consumer Reports,
acknowledged that there was a problem. I'll make you a deal - I won't
mention Toyota and Sludge together in any reply to you, if you don't
bring up any problems with Doemstic products from more than 5 years
ago in any discussions with me.
September 15, 2007. Listen at
http://www.cartalk.com/Radio/Show/04.smil . The call was not for a new
As far as I can tell Toyotas are not significantly diffrerent than
other brands. Toyota apologist often discount horror stories about
Toyotas as either over blown or the Customers fault. Similar horror
stories about domestic brands are often treated as proof that domestic
cars are horrible, There is a clear double standard at work. Hundreds
of thousands of Toyota trucks were recalled becasue of ball joint
failure that have killed at least 7 people and no one notices. Less
that 1000 Focus SVTs are recalled becasue the cruise control cable can
detach and the Toyota crowds considers this is proof that domestic
cars are junk. It is my opinion that Toyota does everything it can to
deny problems. When that doesn't work they try to blame the owners.
And when all else fails, they work to divert attention. Try to get a
list of Toyota TSBs for your car - it is not easy. Try it for a
Chevrolet - no problem.
Toyota dealers are rated as having Customer service similar to Ford
and Chevrolet dealers (actually a little worse). The Toyota sales
departments around Raleigh are on my "do not consider list." The
nearest Toyota dealer I will talk to is in Henderson (40 miles away).
As far as I can tell, Toyota is doing well despite their horrible
Customer service. I still shudder when I remember my last visit to one
of the local Toyota delaers to buy a part (admittedly a long time ago
now). If they had pulled a gun on me, it would not have been much
You make great points - really, you do, but at least speaking for myself, I
believe that people were misled on how long they could go without changing
their oil, hence the sludge thing. I remember seeing stuff on it online.
TEN years ago.
However, I have seen much more recent complaints about small to mid-size
domestic vehicles. Not *all* of them, mind you, but it makes you wary when
they talk about how harshly they are being treated *now*. Toyota certainly
dropped the ball with customer service with the first sludge cases, I'll
grant you - but they appear to have cleaned up that act. BIG difference.
That, at least is why *I'm* willing to continue with them.
Whatever type of file that was, I couldn't open it, so I haven't listened to
it, but you already said it wasn't a *new* Toyota. That's my point. Was
the caller saying Toyota wouldn't help them with a later model car?
Actually, I *have* heard horror stories about Toyota trucks, and some
not-so-nice stories about the Avalon, but not their small cars. I disagree
about the overall quality of Toyota cars, further, I think Toyota is better
at rectifying the mistakes they *do* make. Again, you and I will have to
agree to disagree on that, Ed.
Rick Hendrick is pretty good in the Fayetteville area. And JD Power is even
more subjective than Consumer Reports, so you'll have to show me more proof
than that. Having said this, though, I have had bad experiences with a
couple of Toyota service/collision places, but they were isolated, and were
not the only game in town, so I went elsewhere. The corporation can't be
expected to micromanage down to the mechanic, for f*ck's sake. Same goes
for domestic dealerships. It's a crap shoot.
You have my sympathy, but not my agreement with your view.
OTOH, I had a '76 Datsun B-210 which, when coming to a stop at lights or
stop signs, stalled out on me repeatedly after a few years. Took it to a
repair shop which specialized in foreign cars (not many foreign cars around
here yet at that point in time - that was to change drastically in the next
few years, & I had basically mistrusted the Chrysler dealership where I had
taken my '72 Duster for servicing, so was temporarily scared off re:
dealership service centers) & wound up with 3 filters in the fuel line, but
that little Datsun still stalled out on a regular basis. The good news was
that it always started again, immediately - was basically a PITA sort of
deal rather than a major problem (it never stranded me). Other than that I
liked the car & kept it for 8 years, but because of that one problem I
switched over to Toyota in '84. My sister & BIL had already purchased a
Tercel & loved it - no probs. A Tercel was a little too small for me, so I
bought an '84 Corolla. And have had 3 more Corollas since then, all with
engines which have displayed no problems; great cars, in general.
Seems hardly a week goes by that I'm not replacing an evaporative
emissions canister assembly on a late model Toyota, hell my
sister in laws 2000 Camry is on its third one in 120K miles.
This is a common failure and has been going on for 6-7-8 ??years
When do you suppose we can expect this 'good job of fixing the
problem thing to manifest itself?
Not bashing Toyota (I've owned three in the last 20 years), just
pointing out that your views may not be totally grounded in
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.