Re: The UAW’s Defined Benefactor

Funny how Carlyle keeps having links to bailouts....

formatting link
Billionare bailouts?

The UAW?s Defined Benefactor >
formatting link
> Another taxpayer donation to GM and the auto workers union. > > Welcome to the General Motors bailout, part three?or is it four, or five? > It?s hard to keep up, but this week the federal Pension Benefit Guaranty > Corporation took over the pension liabilities of Delphi, the auto-parts > spinoff of GM that has been working its way through Chapter 11 since 2005. > As with the previous taxpayer rescues, this one includes a special favor > for the United Auto Workers. > > Under the agreement, the PBGC will assume some $6.2 billion in pension > liabilities from Delphi, including both hourly and salaried employees. > That?s the second biggest pension bailout in PBGC history, and it takes > billions of liabilities off the books for GM. As Delphi?s former parent, > GM had agreed to take responsibility for billions of dollars of Delphi?s > pension obligations to its hourly employees. > > It will be months before Delphi employees know what percentage of their > expected pension they?ll receive, but not all pensioners are created equal > in this arrangement. UAW employees will have their pensions made whole by > GM, which insists it is merely fulfilling its end of a deal made with the > UAW in 1999 (when it spun off Delphi) to cover any future pension > shortfall. Few such obligations usually survive bankruptcy, but, nah, we?re > sure politics had nothing to do with it. Less fortunate are smaller unions > and Delphi?s salaried employees, whose pensions may see drastic reductions > and who already lost their health care and life insurance plans on April > 1. They would seem to lack the UAW?s clout inside GM and the Obama > Administration. > > In a letter to the House Financial Services and Senate Banking committees, > Michigan Democrats Bart Stupak and Dale Kildee and Republicans John > Boehner and James Sensenbrenner, among others, have asked for > Congressional hearings on the disparity. Pension benefits, the letter > warned, ?could be cut by as much as 70%, if not eliminated entirely, for > 15,000 retirees.? > > View Full Image > Agence France-Presse/Getty Images > > PBGC spokesman Jeffrey Speicher says that 85% of people who get benefits > receive the entire amount they?ve earned, though he acknowledges that > number is misleading in some scenarios. In a plan like Delphi?s ?with lots > of early retirees, more people will see greater reductions.? OK, but then > why is the UAW special? (Forgive the rhetorical question.) > > By our math, this puts the taxpayer contribution to GM?s survival at > nearly $70 billion: Some $50 billion for the serial rescues of GM itself, > another $12.5 billion for its GMAC credit arm, and now $6.2 billion from > the PBGC. > > Meanwhile, the Administration is putting the PBGC, an ostensibly > independent agency, at further financial risk. After Delphi filed for > bankruptcy, the agency put liens on its overseas assets, providing an > offset in case it had to take on the company?s pension liabilities. Now, > lo and behold, the liens have been removed, allowing Delphi to sell its > assets in bankruptcy court. GM will pay PBGC $70 million for the favor of > releasing its liens, which Mr. Speicher says totalled about $200 million. > Nifty deal for GM, though not for taxpayers. > > When the PBGC was created in 1974, Democrats running Congress assured > everyone there was no taxpayer risk because the agency would be funded by > fees from pension plans, as well as by the assets of plans the company > takes over. But like Fannie Mae, we are learning that sooner or later > these government guarantees always come due. Now the PBGC has a $33.5 > billion deficit even before Delphi, and more bankruptcies are headed its > way. Mark it down as one more way the taxpayers are being put on the hook > for GM, the UAW and Michigan?s 17 electoral votes in 2012. > > > -- > Civis Romanus Sum
Reply to
Canuck57
Loading thread data ...

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.