rust protection?

Hi...

Just about to get the rust check people to treat my car, when I came across a potentially interesting ad in this week's Canadian Tire flyer.

Product is called "Counteract", on sale for 199 Canadian, and claims to "cover your car with an electrical charge, to prevent and inhibit rust"

Maker claims it's been around for 20 years, so wonder if any of you might have any experience with it? Or even opinions?

Thanks, and take care.

Ken

Reply to
Ken Weitzel
Loading thread data ...

Chrysler has 10Y/100K mile warranty. Me personally, its a waste of money and in some cases undercoating/rustproofing may cause more damage in the long run,

My opinion

Glenn Beasley Chrysler Tech

Reply to
maxpower

I agree. I have a '97 Dodge Caravan with 200+ thousand kilometers on it.

It's never been rustproofed or undercoated and there's not a speck of rust on it.

Ed

Reply to
Ed

Hi Glenn...

Think I've misled you; not unusual for me nowadays :)

No warranty left, got a 94 lhs that's every bit as good as brand new. In fact if I showed it to you, and IF you couldn't recognize the year I betcha I could have you believing it was only a year or two old. (except for the sun roof, which doesn't close in the right position, which will be another story)

Rust check isn't undercoating; it's stuff (looks like thick oil) that they spray everywhere. Drill small holes in everything and spray it in. then plug the holes. Costs about 150 bucks, and should be re-done every year. It works well.

The other thing I just noticed in the canadian tire flier is totally electronic, and I can't decide whether it pie in the sky or worthwhile. Seeing I can't properly describe it, here's a link:

formatting link
?FOLDER%3C%3Efolder_id=1408474396670114&PRODUCT%3C%3Eprd_id=845524443292139&ASSORTMENT%3C%3East_id=1408474396670271&bmUID=1157079876823&assortment=primary&fromSearch=true Lemme know what you think..

Thanks, and take care.

Ken

Reply to
Ken Weitzel

Not just your opinion, but Consumer's Union's opinion some years back, as well. They, being locating up in the Rust Belt of upstate Noo Yawk, were already innately familiar with "car cancer" and did some surveys of cars that had various "rust proofing" treatments. It was bad news for the big Midwest-based chain rustproofer at the time, Ziebart. CU said that there was actually more "rot" on floor pans and in B pillars on Ziebart treated cars because the drain and weep holes in such cars were routinely clogged with their spray-on material. The cars that had the least amount of rust damage were those 1.) without "undercoating" 2.) parked in unheated garages and 3.) the owner would flush the underside of the car regularly or have it washed at a car wash with "undercarriage jets."

Your money, your car....a Chrysler pro and CU can't be wrong! I do have a friend up in Noo Hampstah who used to spray the underside of his VW diesel with used motor oil twice or three times a season (QUITE illegal, really) and never had a rust problem in 11 years. In that state, that's saying something!

>
Reply to
DeserTBoB

I had a 1951 Studebaker that had some surface rust here and there on the bottom. There had been an oil leak in the past, which left its mark in the form of caked on greasy dirt. Under that, the car was in like-new condition. Oil leaks have some benefits, apparently.

Reply to
Robbie and Laura Reynolds

I used a spray on grease on a '63 Chev II. Worked great, but a bit messy on long grass until it hardens a bit. for a last 10 years all I do is spray a bit of WD40 into the door drain holes every few years. I drive in very road salty conditions to the ski hills.

I just noticed the first rust on my '95 Concord, along the weld of the left rear door bottom. Since this is not the worst door bottom exposure I expect some build problem. I'll clean it off and apply some rust sealer, then touch up.

Reply to
Some O

Lube oil leaks do, but ATF, being mineral based, is more soluable in water and doesn't seem to help as much in that regard. Stinks worse when hot, too. Someday, I'll learn not to get that stuff in my hair when I do transmission service.

Reply to
DeserTBoB

The best rust protector believe it or not, is motor oil. Back in the

1960-70's, there were a few local body shops and garages performing the service, before the waste oil laws became really strict. They would put your car on a lift, and coat the entire bottom of the car with a fine mist of motor oil. After driving it a few days, a fine layer of dust would be stuck to that oil. It will never rust. These garages had a regular schedule and people would come in yearly or every 2 years for the service.

If you take a look at some really older cars like 1950-60's models, you'll see the driveshaft/transmission tunnel and center crossmember are never rusted out. That's because the oil that blows back off the engine coats that area continuously. But they would rust along the floor sides, where the oil doesn't reach.

It works.

The problem with an "undercoating" is, it eventually dries and chips/flakes off.

For a complete restoration, the best thing to use is a 2-part epoxy. First the frame and underbody must be sandlbasted to bare metal, or dipped in a stripper tank. Then it is primed with self-etching zinc primer, then the 2-part epoxy which contains a hardener just like glue. The result is bombproof and will outlive the car's owner.

Reply to
duty-honor-country

Re electronic protection - it was put into some modern holdens here in Australia snd was a constant low voltage device. As far as how successful it was I do not know. Lushy

Reply to
David

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.