Does any manufacturer quote its vehicles' minimum tow force required ?

This criterea is an important part of efficiency ; directly affects vehicles' mpg, should be disclosed as required by law. i] brake bind : e.g. my 1985 Nissan Sunny 130Y assembled in msia had springs fitted in a wrong way ( the springs force idle brake pads onto brake discs ), so the front wheels could barely spin before I removed these stupid springs. ii] size / height of tyres : the taller is a tyre, the lower will be the min tow force needed to overcome the same brake bind, so cheapo cars with short tyres will need a higher min tow force. iii] toe-in : e.g. my 1990 honda accord's prescribed rear wheels' toe-in kept rolling resistance very high, before I ignored these toe-in. iv] low rolling resistance tyres : e.g. Michelin's "green" tyres have lower rr than Goodyear / Dunlop 's. So if a vehicle has cheap tyres with high rr, then its specification should reveal a higher min tow force required. v] lubricant in wheel bearing : now modern lubricants ( e.g. synthetic oil / fullerene / semi-paraffin ) can be 2x as slippery as grease, so if a manufacturer still puts cheapo grease into bearings, this would cause a higher min tow force. vi] nitrogen in tyres : will significantly reduce rr esp for big / high profile tyres ( like lorries' ). So manufacturers should not be allowed to ignore this fact, @ the expense of mpg & consumers' CO2 discharge.

Reply to
TE Cheah
Loading thread data ...

Not sure how disclosure of the minimum tow force required would help you with this problem.

It's been my experience that as a group car have much lower rolling resistance than 30 years ago. They also offer lower wind resistance, which is in my mind a bigger component of milage.

Don't forget to factor in the added inertia of a larger wheel.

It's a tradeoff between keeping the car moving in a line, tire wear and rolling resistance - nothing new. Unless you know something about suspension geometery I would not fiddle with the recommended settings.

True, but not new news. Any tire represents a tradoff betweel tire wear, adhesion, rolling resistance, etc. I'm sure a tire-smith could construct a tire with very low rolling resistance, but you would probably not like its driving characteristics. One can easily reduce rolling resistance by pumping the pressure to the the highest recommended level.

Possibly...but I'm not concerned.

And you are recommending what in particular?

One has to factor into the analysis the cost of inflating tires with nitrogen vs air...the cost/benefit may end up a lot closer.

Reply to
John S.

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.