Ford, GM mis-spell "hybrid", waste $720 million

G.M. and Ford Plan New Six-Speed Transmission By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Published: April 19, 2004

Filed at 7:37 p.m. ET

DETROIT (AP) -- General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. said they will invest $720 million in three plants to build a new six-speed automatic transmission being developed under a first-of-its-kind partnership between the two rivals.

``Six-speeds are the future,'' Dave Szczupak, Ford's vice president for powertrain operations, said Monday. ``They help to optimize power, smooth operation and fuel economy.''

The front-wheel-drive transmission is expected to offer an estimated 4 percent improved fuel economy over traditional four-speed transmissions in front-wheel-drive cars.

Under a memorandum of understanding signed in October 2002, Ford and GM agreed to cooperate on designing, engineering and testing the new transmission as well as working with suppliers to develop and buy components.

The new gearbox will be used in cars and sport utility vehicles. Production is scheduled to begin at both companies in 2006.

Six-speed automatic transmissions are installed in less than 1 percent of vehicles sold today in North America, Szczupak said. Because of their potential for smoother driving and fuel efficiency, such engines will likely be found in roughly 15 percent of passenger vehicles by 2010 and about half of all vehicles by 2015, he said.

GM is investing $350 million and Ford is investing $370 million to build the transmission. It will be manufactured separately at GM's Warren transmission plant and Ford's transmission plants in Sharonville, Ohio, and Sterling Heights.

Taking on such a project alone would cost as much as $1 billion, said Tom Stephens, GM's group vice president for powertrains. By working together, Ford and GM will reduce the development time by several months and save millions of dollars, he said.

``The investment underscores GM's commitment to keep Michigan's auto industry and communities world class and strong,'' Stephens said.

The world's two largest automakers said more than 1,100 jobs will be retained because of the partnership, including 250 in Ohio and the remainder in Michigan.

United Auto Workers vice president Dick Shoemaker said the project proves that manufacturers don't have to go to the South, China or elsewhere for such projects.

``The announcement of this new product is certainly a cause for celebration, but not cause for us to rest on our success,'' he said.

Ford and GM previously had sold each others' parts and had other minimal business relationships over the years, but this effort marks the first time the two have joined on such a broad program.

In trading on the New York Stock Exchange, GM shares were down 2 cents to close at $46.15 while Ford shares were up 1 cent to close at $13.35.

------

On the Net:

General Motors Corp.:

formatting link

Ford Motor Co.:

formatting link

Reply to
Richard Schumacher
Loading thread data ...

Ford owners will be happy if Ford could make their 4 speed units last longer..

Reply to
JW

Lets see...

Increased complexity: 33% Increased probability of failure: 33% Return on investment- 4% efficiency increase.

Sounds like a real wiener of an idea....

Reply to
Steve

Increased car price: $2000

Reply to
« Paul »

Diehard Powerglide owners said the same thing about the new TH-350, only it had a 50% increase in complexity and probability of failure.

Welcome to the future.

JazzMan

Reply to
JazzMan

They want to create a transmission that both of them use which will cost more and break down more. Then the domestic consumer won't be able to opt for a more reliable "old style" transmission since both companies will be selling the same thing. The final thing will of course be tacking on $2K to the vehicle's price and extending the warranty to 150K miles. End result is a car that will be breaking it's transmission so often that it will only be cost effective to own it as long as it's under warranty. Thus this will flood the used market with cars with shot transmissions and kill the used market, so people will be forced to buy new vehicles. And of course all the extra transmission work under warranty will keep people coming back to the dealerships which will be selling them engine, brake and so on "flushes" and other unneeded service procedures.

Quite a clever plan, I think.

Ted

Reply to
Ted Mittelstaedt

The 700r4 in my S10 (88) & my full size silverado (96) have 5 speeds, counting lockup. Whats the big deal, been making them since the early

80's, whats another gear gonna do besides, as stated above, up the price & increase the probability of failure. It took gm a few years to debug the 700r4 at alot of customer inconvience & expense & I need not go into detail about the electronic abortion that fords' been using for the last 10 or so years. Here we go again, another pipedream probably borne of some tree hugger in engineering. Good luck.
Reply to
PA-ter

You seem to have a personal investment in this transmission, it seems. The accounting folks at the big three are pretty sharp regardless of how we might criticize them, I'm sure they aren't going into this deal lightly. What's really odd is that you've already predicted the outcome years before the transmission actually goes into production. Most people don't predict that far in the future without either inside knowledge or brain chemistry problems.

JazzMan

Reply to
JazzMan

Not even close to a fair comparison. Going from 2 speeds to 3 (and even from 3 to 3+ lockup or 4+ lockup) gained WAY more than 4% in economy. The payoff was worth the added complexity in those cases, but not (IMO) for 6 speeds.

Reply to
Steve

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.