Chrysler Imperial concept a poor man's Phantom

formatting link
Chrysler Imperial concept a poor man's Phantom Posted Jan 3rd 2006 8:00AM by John Neff Filed under: Concept Cars, Detroit Auto Show, Sedans/Saloons

formatting link
Here is the first official pic of Chrysler?s Imperial Concept that will debut next week at the Detroit auto show. Pics of the Imperial lifted from the current issue of Motor Trend have already surfaced elsewhere on the net, and reaction has been unanimous in that the new Imperial looks like a poor man?s Rolls, especially with its pedestrian-flattening grille.

Autoweek reports that the Imperial rides on a 123-inch wheelbase, which is three ticks longer than the 300C?s wheelbase. Overall the concept is 17-inches longer at 214 inches and six inches taller. Those wheels are twenty-twos, so it?s a good thing Chrysler is using the monster 5.7L Hemi with 340 hp and 390 lb-ft of torque to rotate them.

Entrance into the large sedan is achieved through b-pillar-less doors that welcome occupants into an interior orgy of leather, California burl wood and satin-finished aluminum. Many of the components inside are handcrafted, as well, and set off by a bath of warm interior accent lights.

Based on first impressions we?d venture to guess the Imperial Concept has less of a chance to see the inside of an assembly plant than does its concept cousin, the Challenger. If produced the Imperial would occupy the top slot in Chrysler?s sedan lineup above the 300C

Comments:

formatting link
See also:

formatting link

Reply to
MoPar Man
Loading thread data ...

formatting link

I like the center-opening the doors, I think that Chrysler should put them on all their cars, especially the PT Cruiser. Always easier to enter/exit. Hey, it works well on my 1940 Royal

Reply to
Count Floyd

And I thought the 300C had set a standard for butt ugly...

Matt

Reply to
Matt Whiting

What does that have to do with center opening doors? Have you ever had a car with the old-fashioned "suicide doors". If you have, you would make more rational comments on what I was saying. I was not commenting on the "looks" of the new car, I was just saying that Chrysler should return to the clamshell doors, especially on the PT Cruiser. BTW, I had a 2003 four-door and I really wished that it had had the old-fashioned doors. We now have a 2005 PT Cruiser convertible. I think that a convertible sedan in the PT line would be cool!

Reply to
Count Floyd

It's got nothing to do with the doors.

It's got everything to do with the fact that it looks like a Mac truck from the front.

Reply to
MoPar Man

I know how you feel about the looks of the front end, but what I was trying to say was that the concept of center opening doors is a good one that should be extended across the line.

Reply to
Count Floyd

It wasn't about the doors, I just didn't feel like enabling the "view all messages" option, going back and finding the preceding post, replying to it, and then enabling the "view only unread messages" option, when your post was right in front of me and easy to reply to! Satisfied?

Although, now that you mention it, suicide doors are stupid and are called suicide doors for a good reason.

Then again, on a car this ugly, the door configuration will be the least of its problems. I just hope they actually make the challenger look like the original so as to have ONE decent looking vehicle in their line-up. Now that the Excaliber is replacing the Neon, and with the redesigned Dakota, etc., the minivans are now Chryslers best looking vehicles. What a sad commentary...

Matt

Reply to
Matt Whiting

Matt, Then why are so many four door trucks and other vehicles returning to the center opening doors. There are ways to make them not like the suicide doors of old, although on my 48 Plymouth and 40 Chrysler Royal, the doors never came open during driving.

Reply to
Count Floyd

Because the extended cab trucks don't have room for a full-size door and thus eliminating the center post is an advantage. Also, most that I have seen aren't really suicide doors as the back doors can't be opened independently of the front. Maybe the newer trucks are this way, but my brother-in-laws Chevy requires the front doors to be opened first.

Most of the club cab trucks I have seen that have the full size doors open the doors with a hinge at the front.

A car the size of the Imperial has no need to remove the center post and doing so not only gives you a door that opens the wrong way, it reduces the ability of the car to resist a side impact.

Matt

Reply to
Matt Whiting

I was not under the impression that the center post was removed from the car, having not seen the specs. However, if the post were there and the rear doors were hinged at the rear, then they could latch onto the center post, just like they used to in my older Chryslers.

Reply to
Count Floyd

Some have been privately converted. My local dealer had 3 or 4 of them. This was before Chrysler made the 2 door model.

Reply to
Dave

Those convertible sedans must have been beautiful! Here in West Palm Beach there is a dealer named Ragtops that had a 1936 Chrysler Airstream four-door convertible sedan. I wish that I had the $30K they were asking! "What do you mean there's no movie?"

Reply to
Count Floyd

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.