Original List Price $27,680 - $29,775 (1995 model year)
>
> Matthew S. Whiting is of the opinion:
>
>
>>Check the NADA book. It would be a miracle if you could get $5,000 for
>>a 96 with high mileage. I have a 96 with 141,000 that is in great
>>running condition. I just bought an 03, but decided to keep the 96 and
>>drive it till it dies as it is worth only about $3,000, maybe $4,000 if
>>I can find a sucker.
>
>
> Maybe its worth more, maybe less. The most optimistic post was $7000. >
> Pay $30,000 (thats with taxes, license, and extras); 7 years later your're
> down $23,000 plus. Compare that with private planes. There is NOT ONE
> factory-built, FAA certified plane EVER BUILT in flyable condition that is
> not worth more, much more, than its original value in absolute dollars. > Not one.
That is certainly true for most older airplanes, but I'll stop short of saying all as I don't have all of the data and there is almost always an exception to any rule. And I'm not sure this holds true for airplanes of recent manufacture. I stopped subscribing to TAP some years ago when I sold my airplane, but I suspect that airplanes made in the last 5 years or so may well sell less now than their new price, since the recent new prices are pretty high.
Any Cessna, Piper, Stearman, Beech, Aircoupe, Stinson, or any other make
> going all the way back to the 1920s doesn't cost less today then when
> bought new, if in licensed condition. Dollars expressed in numerical
> units, not adjusted for inflation. Reason: when you quote trade-in value,
> you do the same thing. You express the trade in value in terms of todays > dollars.
>
> Why are aircraft so valuable and cars so much junk? Read my past, present
> and future posts. In a single sentence: When cars are built to the same
> engineering standards as light planes you will see a marked improvement in
> trade-in value because people will rest assured that an older used car will
> get them to their destination without a breakdown as compared to today's
> impression that any car older than three years is problematic and needs to
> be trailed by a tow truck.
I don't think it is engineering standards as much as simplicity. Most modern airplane piston engines haven't changed appreciably in design in
60 years. Also, the standards for maintenance to maintain airworthiness and MUCH stricter than for cars. If every car had to essentially function identically to when it was new virtually ALL the time, then cars would be in much better shape for much longer. I used to pay between $500 and $2,000 for each annual inspection. I get my cars inspected for around $20 most years and occasionally $150 if I need brakes to pass. And do you really want to pay the same price for replacement parts for your car as for your airplane? I don't!
Lastly, most airplanes operate in a much friendlier environment than most cars. No road salt, flying gravel and stones, etc. Airplanes based near the ocean do tend to corrode and when they do their value drops dramatically, often to well below their initial sales price. These airplanes may be the exception to your rule above.
Matt