The Aspen, new and old

It was. Plymouth was Chrysler's head-on competitor for Ford's Ford Division and GM's Chevrolet Division for years. Since GM has managed to lose all brand identity through years of "badge engineering" and morphing of all formerly semi-autonomous divisions into just combined operations, DC no longer felt the Plymouth marque was of any value, preferring to hold on instead to the more valuable Dodge marque as their "bread-and-butter" line. A mistake? No...Dodges have been gussied up/better equipped Plymouths and vice versa since at least the mid 1960s. With that, they've also allowed Dodge-type product to slip into the Chrysler marque, such as minivans and the PT, which in another time, would've probably been Dodge branded products.

Reply to
DeserTBoB
Loading thread data ...

3 posts by you in this thread- with no replies

get the picture, troll ??

Reply to
duty-honor-country

"Jalapeno" wrote in news:1160141724.466423.160380 @m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com:

Uh, Plymouth is gone. So DC's "standard" line is now Dodge.

Loosely put, Dodge is to Chrysler as Chevy is to Cadillac (especially the SUVs), except on the GM side the performance is reversed. Cadillac offers the most overall performance compared to the other GM divisions.

Reply to
Joe

Odd the way things have unraveled over the years. Back when Chrysler was the #2 of the Big 3, they were a full line manufacturer, with the economy Plymouth at the bottom battling with Chevrolet, and a marque to compete with just about every GM offering. Ford passed up Chrysler due to increased sales due to Ford's completely new '49 models that included popular Merc and Lincoln models. I believe Ford ran around Chrysler in 1952, even though Ford was still clinging to its hopelessly outdated flathead V8s, while Chrylser had such things as Gemmer power steering, air conditioning and their new hemispherical V8s.

In the '50s, De Soto competed with Oldsmobile directly, with flashier styling and "Firedome" hemis. Chrysler chose to abandon that market segment, probably because of Ford's resurgent Mercury lineup, in the '60s. By 1961, De Soto was basically a stripped down Chrysler Newport with a really funky looking grille, and nothing more. Dodge more or less, especially after Exner started stirring the styling pot, competed directly with Pontiac Division, while Chrysler itself ate away at Buick. The Imperial competed directly with Cadillac into the '60s, but fell flat later on.

Reply to
DeserTBoB

It don't take much to keep you boys entertained, does it? This has got to be the least interesting off-topic thread wreck I've ever seen.

Reply to
Joe

"Joe" wrote in news:OyKVg.1850$ snipped-for-privacy@newsfe04.lga:

Well, _you_ read it, eh?

Reply to
Joe

That's right, eh.

Which Joe is Joe??? Who's on first??

Reply to
DeserTBoB

DeserTBoB wrote in news: snipped-for-privacy@4ax.com:

Gotta read the headers.

Reply to
Joe

My grandfather wouldn't have anything BUT a Dodge! He really knew that they were, as the ads said, "Dependable". He love FluidDrive as he didn't like shifting, but still kept his left foot touching the clutch out of habit! I wish that he would have kept his Dodges, a 50,

51,55 and his last one, a 64 Dart.
Reply to
Count Floyd

No. After you said "Dodge is to Chrysler as Chevy is to Cadillac " that was as far as I got. You're right of course, and I agree completely.

Reply to
Joe

Yes, I know that. Hence the term "was". ;)

And this was the point of my article, Dodge is still the "performance" line. Just because Plymouth is gone doesn't make Dodge "standard". It was a less than perfect analogy to begin with, anyway.

Um, no. I see it as "Dodge is to Chrysler as Pontiac is to Cadillac". YMMV.

Reply to
Jalapeno

That's the rub- its a very imperfect analogy as there was a lot of overlap. I doubt that owners of Plymouth Barracudas, Roadrunners, or GTXs would agree that their cars are "standard" (if anything, the GTX was a bit nicer than its Dodge equivalent, the Coronet R/T- and I say that as an owner of a Coronet R/T). And I doubt that you'd get much argument that a slant-6 Dodge Dart is a "performance" car any more than a slant-6 Valiant.

Fast forward to the 90s up to the end-of-life for Plymouth, and I still wouldn't agree that Plymouth was the "standard" necessarily. However, it was neglected to death. It never got an LH car, and its only "special interest" car was the Prowler, which was a little TOO "special" for most people.

You can argue over that all you want, but the one definite is "Plymouth is to Chrysler as Oldsmobile is to GM." I mourn the passing of both of them.

Reply to
Steve

Saw a purple one on the street yesterday...I instantly wanted one! An OEM street rod...a great project car, but not for the faint of heart.

Reply to
DeserTBoB

especially for you, since no one answers your posts anymore, you've been outed as a troll, and you don't even know your wrench sizes.

Prowler for you ?? that's a laugh...you're driving a 1978 HONDA, remember ? Your other car is a 1986 Chrysler POS.

where would YOU get money for a Prowler ? Your only prerequisite for a car, is gas mileage. You can barely fuel a 4-cylinder, let alone a V-8 performance rod.

Reply to
duty-honor-country

The Prowler only had a V-6, not a V-8.

Reply to
Dave

He wouldn't know. Charlie Nudo aka "duty-onner-country" (also aka "D-O-C", hence the misspelling of "honor") is the "Dumpster Diver from Drums." He thinks GM crap is somehow good, and only came into this NG to harass and stalk me.

But yes...I wouldn't mind having a Prowler for a grocery getter...except they don't hold many groceries!

Reply to
DeserTBoB

What do you expect from Charlie Nudo? He's only here to troll.

Reply to
Charlie Deludo

I

The best. My '95 Concord is running too well to trade. Engine, transmission and body are almost as new, with no repairs, just normal maintenance service.

Thank goodness Chrysler stopped making cars that interest me.

Reply to
who

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.