Ford Loses $1.2B As Restructuring Begins

4/21/06

(AP) Ford Motor Co. said Friday it lost $1.2 billion in the first quarter, its worst performance in more than four years, as revenues fell and the nation's second-biggest automaker started a massive and costly North American restructuring effort.

Its shares fell more than 3 percent in early trading.

The loss of 64 cents per share for the January-March period compares to a profit of $1.2 billion, or 60 cents per share, a year earlier. Sales fell 9 percent to $41.1 billion from $45.1 billion a year ago.

Ford said its results included a pretax charge of $1.7 billion, or 61 cents per share, for costs associated with its Way Forward restructuring plan, which calls for cutting up to 30,000 jobs and closing 14 facilities by 2012. The charge includes the costs of layoffs and buyouts and pay for hourly workers whose plants have been idled.

Excluding one-time special items such as restructuring charges, Ford said it earned $458 million, or 24 cents per share.

It was Ford's worst quarterly performance since the fourth quarter of 2001, when the company posted a $5.07 billion loss due to $4.1 billion in costs for a previous restructuring plan. In the first quarter of 2002, Ford posted a $1.1 billion loss.

Ford's North American automotive unit, which has been struggling with declining sales and high fixed costs, reported a pretax loss of $2.9 billion in the first quarter, including one-time items. Ford said that was primarily due to lower sales, increased incentives, acceleration of charges related to plant closings and losses at former Visteon Corp. plants now under the control of a Ford-managed entity.

Worldwide, Ford's automotive operations lost $2.7 billion before taxes, compared with a profit of $473 million a year ago. That included $2.5 billion in one-time special items such as restructuring charges. Ford sold

1.7 million vehicles worldwide, up 3 percent from a year ago.

Ford's financial arm, Ford Motor Credit Co., earned $479 million for the quarter, down 33 percent from $710 million a year ago. The division said higher borrowing costs due to Ford's junk credit rating was partly to blame.

"While we are not satisfied with our performance, particularly a loss in North America automotive, we are encouraged by the success in our global operations and at the Ford Motor Credit Company," Chairman and Chief Executive Bill Ford said in a statement. "We have said we intend to restore automotive profitability in North America by no later than 2008 and we remain committed to deliver on our promise."

Ford shares dropped 29 cents, or 3.7 percent, to $7.66 in early trading on the New York Stock Exchange, approaching their 52-week low of $7.11.

The Dearborn-based automaker's results were in stark contrast to its bigger crosstown rival General Motors Corp., which reported record quarterly revenues and a smaller loss for the quarter on Thursday. GM lost $323 million for the quarter versus a loss of $1.3 billion the previous year. GM has begun its own North American restructuring after losing $10.6 billion last year.

Bill Ford said Ford is in the very early stages of a dramatic change.

"This transformation isn't going to be quick and it isn't going to be painless," he said. "It involves risks and the financial rewards won't be immediate. But in the end, I believe we'll get there."

Yet another $.02 worth from a proud owner of a 2001 Ford Ranger 4x4 and a

1970 Mach 1 351C @
formatting link
Reply to
Grover C. McCoury III
Loading thread data ...

Ford and General Motors both manufacture terrific vehicles. To loose either of these giants would be devestating to our economy. I currently own a Silverado and was planning on purchasing a 2500HD later this year; to show my personal faith in Ford Motor Company and our economy, I pledge to be driving a Ford Super Duty PowerStroke before summer sets in.

Reply to
Advocate

The history of the Ford Motor Company is a history of a Company adapting to change.

From its very beginnings when HF1 understood that he had to control every facet of the business, including supply of all raw materials because at that time there were no suppliers waiting to sell part and commodities that he needed, on time and of acceptable quality, through their pioneering of the modern auto trailer with Harvey Firestone, through the dark days of latter WW II and then through the days of the T-Bird; the Mustang; the Taurus, of JIT outsourcing; the 1999 Ford Exploder - the Company has survived it all.

And they will survive this. And probably their vehicles will be better yet.

Semper ibi.

H. ============ > 4/21/06

Reply to
Rowbotth

--Yeah, but neither company makes the vehicle I'd prefer to be driving now. I suspect there are other folks like me out there and that the numbers are growing, along with the increase in gas prices.. It's happened before and it'll probably happen again. Anyone remember the Ford Falcon?

Reply to
steamer

Of course. It was the platform that the Mustang was built on.

You proved my po> --Yeah, but neither company makes the vehicle I'd prefer to be

Reply to
Rowbotth

I'll take a '64 or '65 Falcon Futura over most Mustangs(69-70 fastbacks being the exception) any day of the week and twice on Sunday. The convertibles were gorgeous, the Ranchero was sharp, the wagons a little too boxy, but made great cars for the strip. The two doors were sharp looking. 64 had the better chrome, 65 a better grill.

Whitelightning.

Reply to
Whitelightning

Reply to
Simon1952

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.