The Chairman and CEO of General MOtors says: "Being the captain of the Titanic is no fun."

>

> yet they keep on fighting cradle to grave which would radically >lower their legacy costs, and they still fight higher fuel standards, >which has created the fierce competitors they have from europe and >japan, and on top of that, they fight tighter regulation and higher >taxation which has created fierce lean and mean heavy into r&d >european and japanese competitors.

This is the end result of the "bean counter coup" of GM after Al Sloan left in the early '60s. Car guys will remember that's about the time that GM's product started going into the crapper as well, as the bean counters overruled the divisions by instituting a "less car for more money" strategy that showed up first in the dismal 1971 model lineup. Now, the bean counters are reaping what they've sown, as has and is happening all across US industries...the guys that "make the stuff" and are passionate about that have been shoved aside by a bunch of "generic manager" MBAs...they don't give a crap at GM about their product; they're just in it for the money. Al Sloan was a genius at organizing Durant's messy GM into a powerhouse that gave the divisions almost complete authority to design and market their own product, using limited shared materials and parts and central fiscal management. The bean counters screwed that up by first, taking away the divisions' ability to meet their own markets and finally, abolishing the divisions completely, as the MBAs saw their managements as being a threat to their control.

they are a product of the free market. everything they did was market >driven. and to turn the company on a dime when the markets swings all >of a sudden, is ludicrous to think that works when your fierce >competitors are forced to live in reality.

GM since the '70s has felt that the markets will come to them, and despite the pleadings of Wagoner that they're being "market responsive," the opposite is obviously true...they're still trying to "make markets" for themselves, ceding all the real markets to the Asians. If Wagoner were serious about meeting new markets, he would've challenged Toyota's hybrids head on and actually used their resources to "one up" Toyota with the Volt. Instead, he and his bean counter pals just laughed at the Prius and Honda's Insight, while the Japanese quietly ate GM's lunch, and continue to do so, even with conventional models. Now, it's "too little, too late."

"There is a great deal of psychological comfort to be found in a >fully >fledged ideology such as laissez faire because it removes the need >for >critical thought.

"Laissex faire" is a corner stone of the "Rockefeller wing" of the Republican Party, to which all the GM and Ford honchos belong.

The ideology is used as an algorithm. All the >individual has to do in any situation is to ask what the ideology >requires by way of action. The fact that the action may be harmful or >the ideology objectively at odds with reality is emotionally >unimportant for the individual. What matters is that an answer has >been >found which is compatible with the ideology. This is especially >appealing to the less intellectually curious.

...and, as anyone knows, American corporate leaders are ANYTHING but "intellectually curious." A perfect example of such mutton heads was Bob Allen, who almost single-handedly destroyed the "old" AT&T, which was gobbled up by one of its estranged scions, the old Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, which became the power house, SBC. Another such jerkoff is "Neutron Jack" Welch, held in high esteem by other MBAs and brainless Wall Street analysts, reviled by just about anything else. His clone, Jeff Immelt, now presides over a shrinking and increasingly capital based corporation that really has no real product lines other than jet engines (which will wind up going to China soon...bet me) and cheap locomotives for the mismanaged US rail industry. They've managed to trash their electrical distribution product line and have almost ceded the whole thing to the Europeans.

Psychologically, political ideologies are akin to religion and their >practitioners behave in an essentially religious manner. For example, >in the case of laissez faire, its disciples chant "let the market >decide" in the manner of Christians saying "God will provide."

Exactly. That was the response of the RayGunites to Carter's loan guarantees to Chrysler. It was a fait acomplie by the time the laissez faire crowd got into power, but they did their best to sabotage Iacocca's plans by dumping Chrysler stock options right when Chrysler was making an incredible comeback with the K-cars, which gave Chrysler a big hit to their market capital right at a time they did NOT need it. The reason? The loan guarantees violated their "religion" of laissez faire free marketeering, and they were going to use any method possible to make Iacocca (and, of course, Carter) look bad. Didn't work, Chrysler paid back all their loans early and went on to become the lowest cost/fastest to market auto maker in the US. Net cost to taxpayers: ZERO. Then, the whole works came unglued after a greedy ex-GM exec, Bob Eaton, sold the whole works down the river to the maniacal Germans at Daimler-Benz. As Iacocca says now, "He took the money...and RAN!"

Those amongst the elite who are not true believers in laissez faire >will, in most cases, toe the ideological line because they deem it >prudent to do so for their own careers and security. The few who >speak >out against it are simply sidelined.

Iacocca was prevented from going in to snatch Chrysler back from the disaster-bound Germans along with Kirk Kerkorian exactly for that reason...they knew about Iacocca's "liberal" fiscal ideas, and locked him out of being able to leverage Kerkorian's worth into a total "re-buyout" of the company. Now, Chrysler is in the hands of a bunch of laissez faire Republicans, and is cutting about 40% of its model line, and getting ready to issue more pink slips as it closes more plants. Yup...it's another Republican "strip 'n flip" in the making!

Reply to
DeserTBoB
Loading thread data ...

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.