No it wasnt. You said can I "prove" it improves MPG. Well the discharging is part of the inefficiency. But you are too dim to see that.
No we are all using the same alternator with fixed 14.4 or similar output. The batteries RESISTANCE determines the amps drawn at this set voltage. So you dont know how valternators work either then???.
IOne of what? Alternators are fixed VOLTAGE. The current is only dermined by battery resistance and ohms law which is all really simple stuff for most.
Most of that sentence maskes no sense. And impedance refers to resistance at a frequency. And as we are talking about DC here that makes zero sense either... Further showing your ignorance.
The question was can I prove that it improves MPG. Well unless you disregard the laws of physics this alone IS proof.
And I gave a very detailed and clear one that only a moron could not understand. But I expoected as much. I notice that NONE of your answers wever "explain" why you are right...
DC impedance is called resistance...
isn't releveant. It is a product of the
Sorry dummy but every time you charge a battery, or put ANY current through a resistance you get bheat. Not charge but heat. Thats why its less efficient and also why the car would be more fuel efficient with a low resistance battery.
You must be joking. You have so bfar proved that you are a clueless moron with no grasp of either electrics, physics or much else.
No. I dont sell anything. At all. And that is the spec that an optima has for a 50 amp hour battery. Your cheap inefficient starter only battery cant compete AT ALL to this. And that doesent even consider longevity.
All this thread has proved is that you are clueless, dont understand the basic physics or electrical properties at all.
I suggest you argue with sombody less well equiped in future when trying to impress.