1. Home
  2. Subaru Cars Forum
  3. Fuel economy worse with ethynol blend?

Fuel economy worse with ethynol blend?

Car: 95 Legacy Wagon AWD 5sp

I switched to 10% ethanol blended "regular unleaded" a month ago and could swear I'm burning about 2 litres/100km more that I used to (city driving). I think ethanol bends are suppose to burn a little cooler and have higher equivalent octane rating. Could the ECU be running the engine rich because of this?

I'm about to embark on a 900km drive (all highway) and am wondering if I need to do something simple like reset the ECU before hand?

I switched because it is suppose to burn cleaner, but if the ECU is running the car rich all the time, that can't be good...I'd be better off running regular fuel (not to mention saving 1$/100km).

(or is this all my imagination and I should try it for a little more than 1 month!)

cheers!

-- Dominic Richens | snipped-for-privacy@alumni.uottawa.ca "If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!"

Reply to
Dominic Richens
Loading thread data ...

Ethanol has 30 percent less energy per volume than gas. At a 10 percent blend, you'd expect a 3 percent hit in milage. If it takes the ECU time to learn how to optimize the burn (my speculation), the mpg hit would be bigger in the beginning.

Another issue might be water carryover with the ethanol.

Reply to
Jim Stewart

Yep, around 75,000 btu's for ethanol versus 115000 btu's for gas in an American gallon.

nate

Reply to
uglymoney

I expected the difference in fuel economy to be negligible, not 20% worse (2l/100km). Will the ECU "learn" to compensate? My fear is that ECU always thinks the engine is "cold", and is programmed to ignore oxygen sensor reading until the engine is "warm", thereby negating the benefits of ethanol blend. The manual does say you can used ethanol blend, up to 15% ethanol so I would assume they have taken this into account when programming the ECU.

Maybe I should just stop worrying and enjoy the drive :-)

-- Dominic Richens | snipped-for-privacy@alumni.uottawa.ca "If you're not *outraged*, you're not paying attention!"

Reply to
Dominic Richens

Reply to
Edward Hayes

In addition to comments others have made, consider that the optimum A/F ratio for alcohol (methanol, anyway; I assume ethanol is similar) is around 7:1 vs 14:1 for gasoline. Not only does the alcohol contribute less energy to the burn intrinsically, the fact that it isn't getting anywhere near a stoichiometric mix means that the alcohol really isn't contributing much at all. Less power = less mileage. We've had ethanol gas shoved down our throats the last few years, don't even know if you can still get non-blended fuel around here anymore. This makes it tough to do comparisons, but expect as much as a 10% reduction in mileage from my experience in the past with carbureted engines running blended fuels. How much a modern ECU can correct for this is certainly open for debate, but they _do_ learn. It might be worthwhile to disconnect your battery for a couple minutes to reset the ECU, and see if it "learns" better fuel management habits for the blended gas. Let us know if this makes a difference; inquiring minds need to know . . . ;-)

ByeBye! S.

Steve Jernigan KG0MB Laboratory Manager Microelectronics Research University of Colorado (719) 262-3101

Reply to
S

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.