All that alloy vs steel business got me thinking (plus a guy bitching on the ford newsgroup about the lack of 80 profile tires): why there are no high profile high performance tires? I think RE960 which is not exactly the top performer cuts off at 60 and I think the tallest RE950 was 70 (for 14" rims).
Do Americans perceive sidewall flex as a real problem or something? Is that a real problem? Someone mentioned that the sidewall on tires of Formula 1 cars is pretty high and I think you can get the same brake disk performance by making it fatter versus larger in diameter so the breaks argument does not fly wery well.
The reason I'm asking is because 13-15" alloys should weight way less than 17-18" alloys and 185/60 HR14 RE960 is 18 lbs vs 32 lbs for 285/30 ZR20 Looks like the tire weight is almost directly proportional to the width with the sidewall responsible for the "almost" part.
For 285mm W 60 profile tire with outer diameter (OD) of 26.8" I'd need a 13" rim:
26.8" - (286mm x 60 x 2 / 100 / 25.4)=26.8 - 13.6 =13.2"Needless to say there are no ultra high performance all seasons. let alone max performance in 286/60 R13 size. Heck, I think there are no street tires in that size period.
Is the reason the "performance" looks or low profile tires for the rice boys???
Any links to the articles over a few paragraph in length on F1 tires?