Problems with 1998 Grand Voyager Check Engine Light - The saga continues

For six months I have been trying to help my SO fix her mini-van. The mini-van is a 1998 Plymouth Grand Voyager, 3.0L V-6, Automatic with around 128,000 miles. Several months back, her check engine light illuminated, however the car ran OK and the mileage seemed "normal."

Round One - Local Dodge dealer performed a "tune up." Mostly new new plugs. Light stayed out for a few days.

Round Two - Local Western Auto replaced plugs and wires. Light stayed out for a few days.

Round Three - Western Auto Again - replaced plugs again. Light was out for a few days.

Round Four - yours truly - Used ignition switch method to trigger code read out." Got code 43. Checked coil resistance compared to manual, decided it was not quite right, so I replaced it. Disconnected battery and the light stayed out for almost a week.

Round Five - Used code reader and got P0300 and P0305 codes (random misfire and misfire on #5 cylinder). Checked plugs, they looked fine. I decided that maybe the plug wire was not on correctly. Reset light. THe light stayed out for almost a week.

Round Six - Same codes as before. Replaced wires and #5 plug. Reset light. Stayed out for a couple of days.

Round Seven - Same codes as before plus P0306. Decided problem might be leaking intake manifold gaskets, so I replaced them. Reset the light and it stayed out for about three days.

Round Eight - P0300 and P0305 Codes again. In desperation I replaced Plug #5 with another brand NGK and replaced the O2 Sensor with a genuine Chrysler Part. Light stayed out for 3 days but the vehicle did not complete the OBDII Driving Cycle.

Round Nine - Dodge Dealer again. Same Codes. Dealer performs compression test and says the compression is fine. Performs a Leak Down Test and says based on this test, the engine is shot and should be replaced - for $4,000.

Round Ten - HELP!

$4,000 is a lot to but into this van. It is only worth around $4,500 in good condition. I am suspicious of the diagnosis that the van needs a new engine. It runs OK. Not perfect, but no oil usage, no smoke, idle is little rough, but runs smooth at speed. P0305 code usually shows up with a couple of days after resetting the computer. I have certainly driven vehicles that run worse. If I leave the code reader connected to the engine, I never see the mis-fire condition. The problem is almost always the same P0300 along with P0305. Once P0306 was also found, but this was a typical. Not fixing the problem is not an option since this is an OBDII Inspection area.

I am willing to try miracle cures......

Regards,

Ed White

Reply to
C. E. White
Loading thread data ...

You say you replaced the coil, but it might also be a problem with the ignition module itself (I'm assuming that's a separate component on this engine).

It's possible there might be some mechanical problem like a burnt valve or something that's causing a miss, but the dealer's engine replacement recommendation seems a tad extreme. Did they provide details of the leakdown test results?

Reply to
Robert Hancock

--

Reply to
Mike Behnke

I replaced those - no effect.

Thanks for the suggestion.

Regards,

Ed White

Reply to
C. E. White

Unfortunately no. They just said based on the results of the test, they recommended an engine replacement. We don't really care if the van runs like new

- we just want to cure the miss so the Check Engine Light stays out. As far as I can tell, the van runs about as well as it ever did. The van does have a persistent click at idle when cold. This click has been with us for a long time. I assume it is a noisy lifter (if you can use that term for this engine). It usually clears up as soon as the engine warms up. It did this long before the check engine light became a problem. The miss is defintiely not continuous. I have riden for miles with the scan tool attached and never seen it show up.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Regards,

Ed White

Reply to
C. E. White

Reply to
ronm

Reply to
mic canic

Well the vehicle has needed almost no maintenance for 120,000 miles. Until the check engine light problem, it has only needed a belt tensioner replaced. Otherwise it has been a reliable if deadly boring vehicle.

Regards,

Ed White

r> My best advice (This coming from a guy who bought and still have a 78

Reply to
C. E. White

Hello I think you need to find another tech to work on your Van. All the technicians who worked on your Van did not do one important test. It is Fuel system delivery and control test (ie: Fuel pressure, fuel volume flow, injectors flow, injector balance, fuel quality). All of following problem will cause the PCM to set misfire code: Bad fuel pump (low volume, air bubble), restricted injector(s), dirty fuel (water contaminated or rusty fuel tank ...), high carbon deposit in combustion charmber (use borescope to check), poor #5 injector wiring, leaking at injector and a lot more. I would do injectors cleaning (prefer MOTOR VAC service) and Engine top cylinder cleaning first the recheck.

Tree

Reply to
Tree

Thanks for your note and kind suggestions.

I did swap the injectors when I replaced the intake manifold gaskets and it had no effect.

Your suggestion about the camshaft timing is interesting. The timing belt was "professionally" replaced last year. The van seems to run fine after this. Is it possible that a camshaft being miss timed could affect only one cylinder?

What is a top cylinder cleaning?

Thanks again.

Ed

Tree wrote:

Reply to
C. E. White

That is not the Check Engine light.

Reply to
saeengineer

If you have the diagnostic tool, why don't you just flush the codes before going to inspection?

Reply to
Tbone

I don't know where you are but in California Clearing the trouble code to turn off the check engine light before going to smog inspection will most likely fail the inspection test (OBD II monitor test)

Reply to
Tree

Becasue the OBDII Inspection program is not that naive. The PCM requires that a driving cycle be completed before the vehicle is ready for inspection. So far we have not been able to "flush" the codes and have them stayed flush before all the readiness monitors have completed their cycles. I think it is the EGR cycle that takes the longest, and the PCM always sets the misfire code before that cycle is completed. My scan tool is clever enough to monitor the cycles, but not so clever that it can fake them out.

Regards,

Ed White

Reply to
C. E. White

I think the OBD2 3.0 liter Mitsubishis are susceptible to carbon caked intake valves causing missfire codes. It might be worthwhile to have the intake removed and the valves and runners Walnut shell blasted like (IIRC) was necessary on some of the European imports (BMW?) a few years ago.

Reply to
Neil Nelson

Thanks for the response. I have heard that this was a problem from others. Is there any possibility that some additive might "fix" this problem without removing the intake manifold . I am surprised that the dealer did not mention this option. I guess they thought we needed a new engine .

Regards,

Ed White

Reply to
C. E. White

You can clean the combustion chamber by injecting transmission fluid into the PCV valve; metered just enough to keep it from stalling at fast idle. Plan on putting in fresh plugs after the treatment. I don't know if it will solve your problem. Also, go back to stock plugs if any of the newer "miracle" plugs have been used. Hotter heat ranges may cause detonation. Try going to a lower heat range plug if you suspect the misfire is caused by pre-detonation due to too hot of a plug for the current state of air to fuel ratio.

Reply to
David Little

And this little trick is not going to adversely affect the Oxygen Sensor or the Catalytic Converter???

Reply to
cloaked

Back in the days of carbs, we used to pour water down the carb to get rid of carbon build up. especially when we were going to rebuild the engine. Also put a couple quarts of ATF in the crankcase and ran it about 100 miles. Wouldn't believe how clean the engine was when we tore it down after this.

detonation.

Reply to
SPS 700

Water injection? The only engines I've seen there were CLEAN inside had head gasket leaks and.....

Reply to
David Lesher

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.