I said "virtually" universally used, and that's true because roller-cam engines outnumber sliders at least 10:1 in the marketplace. One or two low-end Ford/Mazda engines do not a majority make, even if millions are sold. You can't debate the virtues of hydro lash adjusters without putting it in the context of roller vs. slider, because roller followers eliminate some of the presumed disadvantages of hydro lash adjusters. That was the only point I intended, and I don't think I disagreed with you either. IF you are constrained to a slider cam for cost reasons, then it makes sense to eliminate the lash adjusters too. Its "system" design thinking vs. "component" design thinking- what pieces work TOGETHER the best.