What about the thousands of scientist who do not recieve federal
> funding who contend that man is influencing the current warming
> patern?
Scientific data can be interpreted many different ways depending upon your inclination toward the result.
Also, how can you on one hand claim it cannot be proven and on the
> other claim scientist have proven it?
The same can be said of other things. The existence of God would be one good example.
Thats what I hate from both sides. Both sides claim to have the proof
> and the other side cannot prove them wrong. It sadly represents
> American politics to perfection.
That is the beauty of debate. If you don't like it like that then there are many toatalitarian regimes that you would feel more comfortable living in. They will tell you exactly what to think.