>>
>>> >>>
>>>>
>>>>> >>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hachiroku ???? wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:42:57 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote: >>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and late term abortions
>>>>>>>>>>> aren't done except to save the mother. You've been duped by
>>>>>>>>>>> Jerry
>>>>>>>>>>> Falwell.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Who?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Whoever told you that late term abortions were done for any reason
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> than to save the mother.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But that wasn't what was in the legislation, IIRC. It was >>>>>>>> open-ended.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The legislation would have outlawed intact dilation &
>>>>>>> extraction (the medical procedure otherwise known as
>>>>>>> partial-birth abortion) with no exceptions whatsoever.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Those last 3 words being the sticking point.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cathy
>>>>>
>>>>> Yup.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would have voted against it until it was reworded.
>>>>
>>>> O-kay... but you seemd to be complaining about Obama voting against it,
>>>> which doesn't tally with what you're saying now...
>>>>
>>>> Cathy
>>>
>>> He voted to allow partial birth abortion with no restrictions. I would
>>> have voted against pba under any circumstances until wording was >>> changed.
>>
>>But where would that leave a woman whose pregnancy had extenuating
>>circumstances, in the meantime?? Up the creek with no boat & no paddle. >>
>>Cathy
>>
>>
> My wife had a pregnancy that had extenuating circumstances.
>
> Instead of killing the kid....she let him live.
>
> He is a magnificent human being.
>
> ....and a Conservative.
>
> You libs would have killed him.
>
> Scott in Florida
If a rape victim was desperately poor, had the baby, and ended up on welfare, you'd bitch about her being a single mother who couldn't keep her legs shut, and now she was leeching off society.
Shut the f*ck up, you drunken old piece of shit.