Pretty close. No comparison between the two. Aerstar is a rear drive minivan
based on the Ranger chassis, Windbag, er..Windstar is a front drive minivan
loosely on the Taurus chassis. If looking for a Aero, look for an 96-97, they
best and great performers. If looking at the FWD Windstar, look at 2001-2005
The 95-2000 were terrible.
Thanks! I just got back from the library, looking thru the
consumer books. After looking thru several, I came to the
conclusion that the Aerostar looks like the best all round
for me for the money. Chrysler products get both good and
bad reviews. Toyotas are almost always thumbs up but cost a
lot more and repairs are expensive.
I think it is a stretch to say that the Aerostar is based on a Ranger. I
know Ford included them in the same workshop manual set, but I think this
was because of the engineering group responsible for the design.
Aerostars were designed by Ford Truck Engineering, while Windstars were done
by Ford Car Engineering. Aerostars don't share anything more than engines,
transmissions, rear axles and corporate switch gear with Rangers. The basic
chassis is different. The front suspension is completely different. The rear
suspension (except for the actual rear gear) is different. None of the major
interior bits are shared (seats, instrument cluster, dash, etc). So while,
Aerostars may share design team members with the Ranger, very little else is
shared and certainly no more than might be shared between other Ford
Whether this makes the rear wheel drive (or in some cases AWD) Aerostars
trucks or not I can't say. For truck like applications (hauling loads,
towing), I believe RWD is preferable, which makes the Aerostar closer to a
truck than the front wheel drive Windstar.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.