I've been following this newsgroup for the past 9 months. I am currently Mustang-less, but have been the proud owner of several Mustangs in the past, and hope to be a future owner as well. Listed in order of ownership:
'84 GT (modified) '87 GT Convert (HyperChip only) '64-1/2 V6 '85 SVO
My question about "Rice" is if it has to deal strictly with non-performance import cars being made to look like performance cars (including the gratuitous use of decals, body kits and bad paint jobs) or can it transcend to any vehicle that has useless accouterments?
As I read, I think back to my '84 GT...
headers, dual high-rise intake, dual 500cfm Holleys, 6" snorkel hood scoop, aluminum heads, bored .030, Hurst short-throw gear shift, high energy cam, aluminum rockers, glasspacks, Monza slash-cut dual-tips existing before the rear wheels, etc.
It might be considered ugly by today's standards, but back in '85 the aftermarket was really small, and not many people were taking "new" 'Stangs and heavily modifying them. She would run constant 12.8s @116mhp on those damn metric Michelin tires. So as I said, she was ugly, but she was my baby... but by today's standards would it be considered Rice?