Saga of the noxious fumes, 97 Tercel

Hi,

Just wondering if anyone can suggest anything further about an issue on which I've asked for advice in this group. Here is the problem. Due to a lapse in my own oil-checking diligence, I burned my engine out. My mechanic changed it for a used engine, not remanufactured. The replacement engine had no oil films to prevent rust, etc.. The work took place over 5 days at the beginning of January (cold winter outside, in case that matters). When I got the car back, I smelled all sorts of smells, and noxious fumes that caused my eyes to water and coughing that lasted 1-2 days after driving. Smells include (subjectively):

  • Burning oil or diesel-like smell * Hot oil (smouldering?), not as bad as burning * Burning rubber * Musty, dusty sensation more than a smell, most associated with the lung/eye aggravation

There were black fumes coming out the exhaust upon starting. The valve seals were changed, which greatly mitigated the burning oil smell and eliminated the black smoke from the exhaust. The hot oil smell and caustic fumes persisted. Here were some things checked:

  • No cross contamination between coolant and oil * No damp spots in the heater to suggest a pin-hole leak * No critters or feces up in the heater fan/core * Air ducts blown out with shop air * No fluid level decreased except for engine oil * Exhaust was system was checked (plugged at the rear to check for leaks) * Exhaust was analyzed (not sure what that involves) * Sensors where checked (I think that's what he meant by teradyne) * Cylinder pressure checked * Leak-down tests were good * Engine was shampooed * Aggravating fumes start to come in about 15-20 minutes after starting in winter (-10C or +14F), about 5-10 minutes now (+10C or +50F) * PCV was OK * Grommet between engine & passenger compartments good * A 2nd mechanic confirmed cylinder pressure, grommet, & PCV OK * I changed the PCV valve anyway (running out of ideas) * Visual inspection of firewall and hood gasket by person from Krown rust control

The decrease in oil was due to a leak where the crank shaft enters the transmission. I am at a loss as to why this was not caught after a few visits. I found it by crawling under the car, which is kind of tricky considering that I don't have ready access to my ramps (my apartment's locker policy is to only allow access at 10:30am, my place is too small to store them in the apartment itself). I'm mentioning this because it is something I have to be careful about -- I have to access the thoroughness of my mechanic rather than dismissing some possible causes because he didn't find any indicators. I've been bringing my car to him for a long time, and I think he is ethical and competent (and goes way out of his way to make accommodations). But I cannot understand how such a big leak could have been missed, and that simply affects how I go about troubleshooting.

Regardless, the oil stopped leaking after the seal was replaced. He also replaced the gasket where the front pipe meets the exhaust manifold, in case that was the cause (he thought it prudent when he noticed some soot around the old gasket). He prophetically said that he didn't think that was the cause of the caustic fumes -- something which makes sense, since the fumes did not smell like exhaust. Along these lines, a body shop manager at a Toyota dealership said that the car had no rust or perforations that might cause exhaust to be drawn in from the back.

Somethings which seemed to help for less than day (might just be wishful thinking) are:

  • Driving through a touchless car wash with undercarriage spray * Pooring pails of warm water into the ventilation intake grill beneath the wipers * Aiming pressurized spray down the vent intake grill for 3 minutes * Having a detailing place shampoo the engine compartment

All of these washings reduced the smell. The last item practically eliminated all smells, including the chemical smell from my mechanic's shampoo. None of these washings seemed to have helped with the caustic fumes beyond a few hours, if at all.

I noticed on more than one occassion that when speeding up or down shifting, I get a whif of that dusty/musty smell associated with the caustic fumes at the top of the 1st or 2nd gears (when the engine revs are high). Based on my own rather naive understanding of things suggested in this group, it seems to indicate a head gasket problem, and a pin-hole leak in the heater core. That is, when the engine is reving high, maybe there is more pressure leaking to the cooling system, thus aggravating a pin-hole leak in the heating core. I realize that there are many counter-indications, such as the lack of cross contamination between oil & coolant, good results from leak- down test, and the lack of damp spots on the heater core. About the last point, however, I'm not sure if such a pin-hole leak would show except at high revs. I asked my mechanic to try a test suggested here: connect the intake and exit hoses to the heater core so that the coolant bypasses the heater core, and empty the coolant out of the heater core. He said that has the same effect as turning the air temperature to cold, but I suggested that there may be a difference, since the heater core is not empty of coolant when the air temperature is set to cold. He has agreed to do this, but his only opening is in about 2 weeks. I will drive with the windows down until then (hope it doesn't rain much). If that gets to be too long, I'll bring it somewhere that can do it sooner.

This testing for a leak in the heater core only a shot in the dark, in the absence of any other possible debugging ideas, and especially considering the counterindicators. Can anyone suggest any other course of action?

Tercel Owner

P.S. The oil level dropped from 110% to 80% in the last 2 weeks. I take 100% to mean the full range from "full" to "low". So 100% is at the full mark, 110% means that last oil top-off was 10% over the full mark. I thought all gross causes of oil consumption were eliminated by replacing the valve seals and stoping the leak where the crankshaft enters the transmission, but I wonder if a 30% drop in 2 weeks is normal?

Reply to
Tercel Owner
Loading thread data ...

Good run down of symptoms. My 2 bits worth ... If you had a coolant leak, you would smell coolant inside, not really burning. You may also get misting on the inside windows on defrost. A hint for me is the exhaust gasket replacement. Your mechanic probably had to use a type of "liquid wrench" penetrating oil on the exhaust manifold to get it off, and this may be taking a while to burn off. To be as hot as you say, I was thinking is would be something contacting the exhaust or engine directly, not really cooling system related.

Hope it "burns off" for you. UUhh do you have a plastic bag stuck to your exhaust pipe underneath? Did that once ...yuck!

Reply to
Gordo

I thought that I would be able to smell a coolant leak in a much more identifiable way, too, so I was dissuaded from pursuing that anymore, especially since my mechanic didn't find any wet spots on the heater core (he was peaking into it without having removed the dash). However, I can't think of any other possible explanation, so coolant leak is the only thing I can try to eliminate right now. Even though I *don't* get misting or filming of the windows. However, a more car-savy friend said that you don't need a whole lot to cause aggravation, especially if it is being turned into a gas.

The exhaust gasket replacement (thanks for providing the terminology) was done quite late in the troubleshooting stage. The problem existed well before that. Well before replacement of valve seals and the seal that stopped the leak where the crankshaft enters the transmission. Those new seals did eliminate some pretty big problems, but the caustic fumes (and the occassional musty/dusty-seeming "smell") persist.

Nope. Nothing stuck to the exhaust system. But thanks for the suggestions about the exhaust gasket and the plastic bag.

I'm just waiting for the mechanic to make some time to connect the heater hoses so that coolant bypasses the core, to eliminate a possible heater leak. I posted again asking whether the heater could be emptied of coolant without having to remove the dash to get the heater out. I also asked about how to confirm that the heater was indeed empty. If you have anything to say about that, I'd love to hear it.

Fumigating Tercel Owner

Reply to
Tercel Owner

If the heater core inlet and outlet are situated above/below each other, the coolant should just run out the bottom pipe when you disconnect the hoses. If they are horizontal, they will dribble out, but you would have to help gravity a bit. Its hokey, but you could connect a piece of heater hose on one inlet and blow it out with your lungs. Course, this is coming from a guy with years of experience in syphoning gas! You won't need to empty it to get rid of your hot smell, (if this is your problem area) because it won't be getting hot coolant, and it won't be pressurized. I vote to leave the coolant in the core if you don't want to blow it out, run your bypass if this is what you suspect, and hope the neighborhood cats don't begin to lap up your coolant puddles. I'm sure you know coolant is fatally attractive to animals! I was going to make a mother-in-law and Prestone Martini comment, but that is best left for another forum.

I just thought of something .... I wonder if your termperature selector shuts off the coolant supply, or simply an air divertor door. You could give this a shot too. Turn temp to cool instead of hot and see what happens. Could also be the source of the fumes coming in. Some troubleshooting there may give you another clue as to source and method of transfer into the passenger compartment.

Gordo

Reply to
Gordo

Uhm. Yes. The hazards of coolant in the open is noted. That is one of the things that discouraged me from thinking further about doing it myself (no garage, just a spot in an outdoor parking lot).

The nozzles are beside each other rather than one above another. There are just rubber hoses that wrap around the nozzle, pinched snug by a circular metal clip. I would need a bridging tube for the two hoses to connect to when I pull them both away from their respective nozzles. Since it's pressurized (I presume), coolant will splatter on the ground, and some will definitely leak when I go about clasping the hoses onto the bridging tube (assuming that I find a suitably sized tube).

If I were to blow out the heater's coolant with my breath, I need a clean piece of proper-size hose to plug onto the intake nozzel, which a Toyota parts dealer can probably supply (probably at a premium). I can get a bin to collect the splattering coolant. Do-it-myself is certainly possibility, once I've fought off my next academic fire. That brings me close to the day on which my mechanic can do it. It may be better to wait and let him do it, since he'll probably use shop air for a more thorough emptying of the heater. I know you said that not emptying the heater is probably OK, since the coolant is neither heated nor pressurized. Having experienced the drastic effects of these fumes on and off over months, however, I'd much prefer to eliminate any possible doubt. It would be terrible if the heater did leak, but I dismissed it because bypassing the heater didn't seem to fix the problem.

If I have my mechanic do this, however, I would have to verify that the heater was emptied. This is because the shop has missed a big-ish item in the past i.e. not catching the leak at the transmission. Again, not to assign blame; it just implies that I have to verify things. So I might end up trying to blow into the heater with a clean hose anyway.

I'm told that the coolant stops flowing to the heater (but the coolant is still present in the heater) /and/ a baffle flips so that the pathway for the air does not go over the heater. It's hard to tell whether the temperature setting affects the severity of fumes, since the aggravation and coughing lasts for 1 to 2 days after exposure (doesn't immediately get better after switching temperature). It almost seems as if temperature setting makes no difference, which would indicate that the problem is probably not with the heater core. However, I'm completely out of ideas of what else it could be.

Since the aggravant becomes apparent more slowly when fans are set on recirculate, I thought it might be contamination in the intake vents, but flushing them with boiling water and warm pressurized water jet doesn't help. The grill is also fine enough to prevent any critters from getting in there.

The other possibility is that the fumes are generated under the hood, and just creep around to the intake vents. That would explain why it still seems vaguely present even when all windows are down (fan on recirculate, directed at feet, and temperature at cold). I also find that when I open the trunk, I smell the Krown (or some kind of oil) pretty clearly. Lifting the "carpet" shows that the Krown oil is sweating over many surfaces. However, I don't think that is the source of the caustic fumes.

Thanks for your comments and suggestions.

Tercel Owner

Reply to
Tercel Owner

this is probably a blameless incident, not oversight, as leaks happen especially if the motor has sat around a while. it might not have been leaking when it left the shop shop.

Reply to
PCK

Got us curious.

Reply to
Gordo

Original thread:

formatting link
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 04:32:50 GMT, "Gordo" wrote in alt.autos.toyota: > Got us curious.

Sorry for the late response, I didn't see this article grouped under the original thread. I only found it when googling for more information.

Since shampooing the engine at the care detailing service, I found that the fumes are present even though the smells are not. I think it might be the heater core misting coolant into the air in minute amounts, too small to smell or to leave a film on the windshield. I use to think that it was when the coolant was pressurized e.g. during high engine revs; but that would indicate a head gasket problem, of which there are no other signs. Because there was no other explanation, however, I asked my mechanic last week to bypass the coolant around the heater core, and empty the core of coolant. It took a week to get the courage to do an real test by setting the fan on ventilate with windows closed...because my response to such exposure to the fumes was pretty bad in the past. I thought it takes a day or two for the coughing to subside, but that's just the most violent coughing. The congestion seems to take several days more to taper off. For the past week or so, bypassing the coolant around the core seems to have alleviated the effects of exposure, but I kept my habit of driving with all 4 windows down, fan set to recirculate and turned off. I still get a bit of the respiratory reaction when driving, but that is probably light fumes from under the hood. Given that there is still some steady oil loss, this could well be residual fumes from outside, this might be from some trace leakage of oil onto a hot surface.

Yesterday, I took the plunge and subjected myself to ventilation air, windows closed. Before vs. After? After, there was not much noticable difference from the residual aggravation that was present Before. So disconnecting & emptying the core seems to get rid of most of the aggravant. Hence, it is likely that the core has got some kind of leak, if only a small one. If so, it must be so small that I can't discern any chemical smell from the coolant. There seems to be a consensus on this from passengers who would be able to recognize coolant smell. I have enrolled in a car care course to become comfortable enough to change the core myself, maybe have it reconditioned. The course deals mostly with routine maintenance, but any amount of exposure to increase comfort level helps, especially since I have only a parking spot in a lot, no sheltered working area, and not even extra space to put tools. Has to be done fast, within a single day. And I'm about 2 hours round trip from a hardware store (walking).

I am still concerned about the oil loss. I plotted the my plentiful oil readings against mileage -- they are a bit jagged, cuz the dipstick is only so accurate (and possibly cuz of temperature variations). I'm losing about 0.5L/1000km. It was about 0.7L/1000km prior to changing the valve seals months ago. I also notice that the loss didn't change after the mechanic fixed the leak where the crankshaft enters the transmission, months ago; so I suspect that the leak was transmission oil. I'm surprised he declared the problem solved after fixing that leak, since the original symptom being troubleshot was engine oil loss. At any rate, he hasn't been accepting my measurements since then, which presents a serious problem. 0.5L/1000km works out to 2.5L per oil change, which is way on the high side -- especially for a 97 Tercel with about 130,000km on it. I will see what I can do to convince him of the accuracy of my data. I basically got a very commonly-used computational program to fit a straight line through the somewhat-jagged data and provide an estimate of the decrease in oil versus kilometers. These oil loss calculations assume 1L from the High mark to the Low mark on the dipstick. If that range actually represents 1.5L or 2L, then the actual loss is that much more.

I realize that respondents to the earlier thread say that it is unlikely that a core leak is related to the current engine. The lack of symptoms for head gasket problems suppor this. However, I haven't been able to reconcile that with the lost oil. There are no drops anywhere. Apparently, emissions are OK, but I don't know if I can trust the mechanic anymore (too many things that just don't make sense, which I've described previously). I may get the emissions checked independently. The costs for checking the mechanics assessment just keeps going up. But this seems to be an important checking point, since I will have to have the engine rebuilt or replaced if it can't pass the next emissions test. If the lost oil is not going out in the emissions, then I don't know where it can be going out.

One check that might be revealing prior to any work on the core is to have a pressure test done on the coolant system. But if the core leak is really so small, I'm not sure if it would show up. This is yet another cost...

Tercel Owner

Reply to
Tercel Owner

P.S. In the original thread

formatting link
was considered acceptable. Is this true fora 97 Tercel? From asking around, it seems that suchcars generally don't have noticable leak at all. AndI wonder if this figure of acceptability is from beforethe days of emissions control regulations? T.O.

Reply to
Tercel Owner

The cooling system will become pressurized during normal operation as the coolant heats up. A head gasket leak could add more pressure but other symptoms usually appear before cooling system problems.

Because there was no other

During the warranty period, acceptable oil consumption is considered 1 quart per 1,000 miles, or approximately 1 liter per 1,600 km. Obviously, most new vehicles use much less oil, and older engines use more. It is likely that your replacement engine was one that was well-used.

Do the cooling system pressure test while you are taking the auto shop class, then it's free!

Reply to
Ray O

Sorry, I meant "overpressurized". But it's good to know that it probably isn't a head gasket problem, despite the oil loss.

That's the puzzling part. It was only at about 125000km when it was put in. My original engine didn't show any noticable oil loss at several 10's of thousands of km more than that, and my 89 Tercel from before didn't showed any noticable oil leak at nearly 200000km. I spoke to a few car-savvy colleagues, and it seems that this is normal for Japanese cars. Maybe the engine was neglected, or constantly floored. But I hear you about the 1L/1600km -- is this some kind of Toyota policy? Can documentation or formal utterance of some kind be found somewhere?

Yes, and they have a dyno, too. I can do emissions. I really wish there was a do-it-yourself place in town. I think the time avaialable in the class is limited. But it certainly is insightful, and helpful in getting comfortable with puttering around.

T.O.

Reply to
Tercel Owner

Actually, if it's only misting, and only at high engine revs, it might not show up in pressure test. Especially if I'm not revving the engine during the test. I'm keeping in mind that if it is a minutely breached core, it is so minor that it doesn't show damp spots or smell like coolant. So a presure check that shows no loss might mean it wasn't the cause, or that it was too minute.

T.O.

Reply to
Tercel Owner

The most common cause for oil consumption at the high side of normal is neglect or high mileage..

Documentation regarding oil consumption is in the factory repair manual. It may also be in your owner's manual or warranty manual.

The problems with do-it-yourself places is liability. If a vehicle falls off a lift because it was improperly supported or unbalanced or a part of a vehicle's safety or emissions system failed or whatever, the shop would probably be named in a lawsuit. From a commercial point of view, the profit is in selling parts and labor, not renting space.

Reply to
Ray O

If a part of the cooling system, including the heater core, is leaking, it will show up in a pressure test. To do a pressure test, you attach a pump to the radiator neck, run the car to open the thermostat or remove the thermostat, set the heater to full hot, and then use the pump to pressurize the cooling system. If there is a leak, the pressure gauge you have attached along with the pump will show gradually decreasing pressure.

Reply to
Ray O

In this case, it certainly wasn't high mileage. It must have been neglected.

The threshold of acceptable oil loss is not in the owner's manual. I have a Tercel Repair Manual for my former 89 model, but it doesn't specify this either. Neither does the Haynes manual for 87-94 models. It probably depends on local regulations.

Yes, I have heard stories of an injury that happened when there use to be more than one such service. Too bad the waiver of responsibility hasn't been enough to allay the concerns the would-be proprietors.

Thanks for that.

On a closing note, after several days of exposure, I can say that bypassing the coolant around the heater, and flushing the heater, has mitigated the aggravating fumes that come from the vents, it has not eliminated them. The subjective feeling of causticness when breathing in the air is diminished, but still invokes violent coughing that persists at least a day (I haven't gone more a day without driving so far, but I suspect that it takes several days to noticably subside, as before).

Tercel Owner

Reply to
Tercel Owner

Sorry, I was wrong. I looked at my owner's manual and it talks about normal oil consumption but does not actually specify what is acceptable or not. The factory repair manual and warranty manuals also do not give specifications. The only other place I can think of where I saw the spec is in the warranty policies and procedures manual which dealers use as the final determination of what is warrantable or not.

You're welcome!

Before you go through all the trouble and contortions of replacing the heater core, I would re-connect it and perform a cooling system pressure test. If it tests ok, then it is not leaking. It is possible that something like mold or mildew is coating the heater core surface and you are having a reaction to that. You can try setting the HVAC to recirculate mode, fan on high, and spray a disinfectant like Lysol or Frigi-Fresh (sold to dealers for automotive air conditioning freshening) into the intake under the dash. Make sure your eyes are nowhere near any vents on the dashboard (set the vent to defrost).

Reply to
Ray O

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.