Prices are similar, although the 911 is a tad more expensive, but I'm
split between the two.
I've read the M3 is more edgy and unrefined, but a blast to drive...
while the 911 is smoother and everything just seems to work perfectly
What is your experience?
Which has higher maintenance costs? Higher insurance costs?
Any recalls, or other mechanical problems that these models are know
Thank you in advance!
On 1 Sep 2006 15:32:05 -0700, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
The M3 is a more practical car - I'd get one if I wanted a high
performance daily driver. The 996 is the better choice if you're
looking for all-out performance with some compromises.
In more detail: the 2001 M3 had some engine bearing problems, iirc.
BMW extended the factory warranty on them to 6 year/100,000 miles, so
the car likely has had all recall fixes done and is still covered by
warranty. BMWs come with longer warranties than Porsches and included
maintenance, so a daily driver BMW has likely had no compromises in
how it was cared for. The engine is a multi "Engine of the Year" award
winner, it's handling is close to the Porsche, it's brakes nowhere
near as good. It's residual value doesn't hold as well as the 911,
however the 996 is one of the fastest depreciating Porsches ever - it
sold well to new buyers, but isn't as popular with Porschephiles. The
993 has held it's value better, despite being older.
"Everybody wants a normal life and a cool car;
most people will settle for the car." Chris Titus
2003 BMW 325i Black/Black, 2003 BMW Z4 Black/Black
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.