Hoopla over DRL

Who would have thought that the posting with the longest most passionate thread around here will be about Daylight running Lights. I am impressed!

Reply to
Just Me "Koi"
Loading thread data ...

You have to know how passionate Americans are about being told what is good or bad for them.....then you'll understand. Canadians aren't much different, except we keep our passion to ourselves and eat it. People think we're nice when we're just plain frustrated. Daytime Running Lights are one of the best additions in auto features since the seatbelt, in my opinion.

I hope you're suitably impressed : ) By the way, I like to post on top. On top is a favoured position in many cases.

Reply to
Arthur Alspector

You're welcome to your opinion, but real-world facts don't support it.

By "real-world facts" I mean actual, real reductions in injury, death and property damage. If you list the safety improvements made to automobiles since the 1940s, there are a great many items -- probably around fifty -- on the list between seatbelts (number one) and DRLs.

DS (in Canada)

Reply to
Daniel J. Stern

Ugh. DRL are pretty damn stupid. They waste gas and do nothing that anyone else can't do on their own. If you think the conditions warrant it, you can reach over and turn on the lights yourself. Some DRL's are very stupidly designed, GM, and they use high beams which is damn stupid. Seatbelts are a proven technology and should not be compared to DRL's which have no benefit.

-------------- Alex

Reply to
Alex Rodriguez

Speaking of Canadians and Americans (USA). I don't know if I shared here that I am an Alien (The type from outer space that is :-))

Anyway I took my family on a journey to Washington DC. It was very re-assuring for me to share what I think of USA to my kids born here. How impressive the government buildings are, but more importantly knowing that the power residing in those impressive buildings lie in the hands of the people. That the choice of who will be in the white house next year is totally in the hands of the people, in cities, villages, suburbs, inner cities, etc. That if there is going to be a change, it will be without violence and blood shedding. That no matter who wins, the whole country will be behind him or her until the next 4 years cycle.

Forgive me for getting carried away, but it meant so much to me, and gives me hope and reassurance that I did the right in picking this country to raise my family in.

Reply to
Just Me "Koi"

Just wanted to see if you were at home, Dan : )

I said 'one of the best additions'; I didn't say was the absolute best. I think back to the late 50's and 60's when people used to go to the auto store and purchase those single, white lights to mount on their grills just so other drivers could see them at a distance during the daylight hours. Not too many people used them, but I remember the ones who did because I could see them coming for miles...and that is the reason I love them. I have been driving for over 45 years (legally) and I still find it comforting to be able to see a vehicle at a distance coming at me when I am considering overtaking another car and must move into the oncoming lane to do it....and the reason I can see it is because of the 'daytime running lights'.

There I go T>

Reply to
Arthur Alspector

It seems like they would do more harm than good. In bad weather everyone turns on their lights anyway and in good weather they just provide a distraction, I find on coming lights in the daytime to be really annoying.

As for the difference between Americans and Canadians, that goes back to the American revolution. The people who liked big government went North after the revolution. So when King George tells Canadians that they have to use lights in the daytime they do it whereas Americans would just dump their DRLs into Boston Harbor.

Reply to
General Schvantzkoph

"Arthur Alspector" wrote

to be able to see a vehicle at a distance coming at me when I am considering

I've got about the same number of driving years as you and I agree completely. I have great respect for our American neighbours or neighbors but really they do get awfully silly about some "liberty or death" issues. DRLs and allowing tens of millions of their citizens to go without health care coverage above all. Anyway, back to cars (he says as he jumps into a foxhole to avoid the incoming artillery... :

Reply to
Dave Gower

I find on coming lights in the daytime to be really annoying.

Because they're so much brighter than the sun and you never wear sunglasses.

King George?! Are you for real?

Reply to
Rick Blaine

How bout some of those "real world facts". Or are they just "Danny's world facts." I suspect the latter.

Reply to
Rick Blaine

The shocker is that the Federal Government in Canada goes along with the poor lighting standards permitted by the US regulators. They could insist on e-code lights that are self leveling, on amber turn lights, on northern European standard DRL's, etc; but noooo, they allow the same crap forced upon us in the states.

Richard.

Reply to
Richard

We're not ones for showing off and irritating our American buddies. They could get mean and make the borders even slower to cross in an attempt to keep American money in America. By the way, last Thursday was indeed a 'red-letter' day for me...I saw THREE 300C's in one afternoon. Way to go D-C! This has to be an all-time record for me to date,

Arthur

Reply to
Arthur Alspector

Reply to
deadbeat

Thanks for your concern. Do you know what sarcasm is?

Reply to
Rick Blaine

They have no choice; the US automakers and DOT have 'em by the short and curly hairs.

Transport Canada was going to permit ECE-spec whole vehicles. The idea went through (and passed) all the safety and cost analyses, clear on up to the top levels of TC. When public-comment time came, the US regulators (NHTSA) said "Don't do it! If you do this, then we'll be the only ones in the world doing something different!". The US-based automakers said "Don't do it! If you do this, it'll screw up our parts allocation system. We don't want a car we built for use in Germany showing up in Canada." And so the answer was "No" for reasons having nothing to do with safety.

The crash-avoidance regulators in Canada are not stupid. They know a good headlamp from a bad one. They know a good turn signal, a good DRL, a good brake light, a good regulation from a bad one. They know all the problems with the US regulations. But they are prevented from changing their standards significantly without US NHTSA permission by the threat of a NAFTA "restraint of free trade" lawsuit. Quote from the horse's mouth: "I'd mandate amber turn signals today, but tomorrow GM would get an injunction based on interference with free trade."

At least ECE headlamps are legal in Canada...

Reply to
Daniel J. Stern

You ain't been around here very long. Do a Google search on a thread with the subject "Jeep thing or sheep thing"...aw, hell, I'll just do it for you...

formatting link
You think the DRLs thing is heated? Oh, my goodness.

How's the Magnum?

--Geoff

Reply to
Geoff

,

There's some truth to this. When Europeans ask me to explain America I always say the best way to understand us is to remember that our ancestors came here to escape European politics in one form or another. That's why we don't have them. A lot of people who didn't support the Revolution moved to Canada. Today, it's clear Canadians still think along European lines when it comes to politics. With Quebec, they have their own small, internal version of international hatred. Luckily, it'll never flare up in to the "sport of kings". If you had a couple of inbred first cousins ruling Ontario and Quebec as monarchs, though.... well let's hope it doesn't come to that.

I heard a joke about it a while back: Canada had the promise of French Culture, British Politics, and American Wealth. Instead they settled for British Wealth, American Culture, and French Politics. Hard to argue with that...

I still can't for the life of me understand why anybody rational would really dislike DRL's. They sure don't distract me, unless you call noticing a car distracting..

Reply to
Joe

Loving it! Best darn Car I have driven! And I have driven many fine cars.

By the way, it does have daytime running lights. :-)

Reply to
Just Me "Koi"

Well, for starters, there's the obnoxious high beam Saturn DRLs which cause painful/distracting glare even in the daytime (if it's overcast,) also the turn signal DRLs which cause for ambiguous signaling...

It's not the DRLs I object to (although I don't see the benefit of having them) it's the piss poor implementations that make having them more dangerous than not.

nate

Reply to
Nate Nagel

I would argue that a car that you say you "can see coming for miles" away and screaming "look at me", when it's location relative to yours is of absolutely no concern to you (and may never be if it turns off before getting to you) IS therefore, by definition, a unnecessary/unneeded distraction away from paying attention to those vehicles that are closest to you (and that should actually be receiving your attention). And those vehicles that are close enough to you to actually matter to you are plenty visible in the daytime from my 35 years experience driving (at least at sun angles present in the "lower 48").

Like Dan has already said...real world results basically have disproved what you believe in with these things. That being the case, the energy required and the pollution created to power them is very likely a big waste (no benefit for the costs).

Oops, I top posted too! :-)

Reply to
James C. Reeves

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.