Bogus VIN plate on '67 Firebird ragtop?

Even if you are from a diff state and just driving through? If so, that seems harsh.

-Geno

1985 Blue Camaro 2.8L w/T-tops (148k and going... getting worried) 1988 Blue Firebird Formula 5.0L w/T-tops (For sale for $2,200) Still looking for an '82-'84 T/A w/T-tops for parts from one
Reply to
KITT
Loading thread data ...

I once lived close to Dayton.!!! :-]

Reply to
Camaro Cowboy

You had the car 4- 25 years HUH! Just get it registered and if they say anything tell them u stole it 25 years ago....statuit of limitations ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

.>The VIN plate on my '67 Firebird convertible is for a coupe,

Reply to
DOXIE

Thought all u REPUBS were honest JESUS FREAKS VOTE 4 KERRY

Reply to
DOXIE

digit/character

it...especially

First of all put the crack pipe down.

Then pull your head out of your ass.

No president, no matter what political party will change anything that is the fault of local government. Too many idiots blame a president for acts of congress, or state senates. People that do, have no understanding of how to fix a problem, and who needs not to be in office.

I don't discuss my politics on-line (rarely in person). If I want a political debate I can have one in my shop at any time with people more intelligent then you. Charles

Reply to
Charles Bendig

That's it!

Tell the bitch Charles!

LOL

Refinish King

understanding

Reply to
Refinish King

It seems to me that the VIN plate on the car is a factory mistake, with one number off, although PHS guy Jim Mattison says he has never seen such a mistake. I just bought the PHS info package on the convertible version of the coupe VIN plate found on the convertible in my garage (one digit off). There was no coupe made with that serial number (last 6 digits of the VIN) that year at that plant, according to PHS. Everything in the PHS packet for the convertible matches what's left in the car, and matches the body tag, which seems to be correct. (I can't conclude much based on the engine and trans info since I bought the car without these.) The original paint, Mayfair Maize, listed on the convertible billing history, is still in the nooks and crannies where the painter didn't reach when the car was repainted red at some point. So I believe I can make a case that the VIN plate is a mispunched item, if the state asks me when I go to get it registered.

Thanks for all the help, guys.

Reply to
PH

That gives some credence to the story.

Does the Fisher body job #s on the sheets you got from PHS match the cowl tag? Does the cowl tag state the vehicle is a convertible or hardtop?

You can easily prove it's a mistake if you have documents that cross-check each other. That is one reason why this is done.

Joe--ASE Certified Parts Specialist & 10th Ann.Club Tech Director '80 Carousel Red Turbo T/A, 27k orig. '79 "Y89" 400/4 speed 10th Ann. T/A, 57k orig '84 Olds 88 Royale Bgm 2 dr, 307 "Rocket" (lol), 143k and still going.... '91 S10 Blazer 4.3Z

Reply to
Bigjfig

I don't know where to look for a Fisher body job # on either the PHS sheets or the cowl tag. What I got from PHS is a 1967 Car Billing History.

The cowl tag on the car is for a convertible.

Reply to
PH

The 1967 PHS documents are a little strange and primitive, but do ANY numbers on either sets of documents match anything on the cowl tag?

The Fisher body job # is usually on the RH side of the cowl tag after the plant code and data stating the Fisher basic model.

Joe--ASE Certified Parts Specialist & 10th Ann.Club Tech Director '80 Carousel Red Turbo T/A, 27k orig. '79 "Y89" 400/4 speed 10th Ann. T/A, 57k orig '84 Olds 88 Royale Bgm 2 dr, 307 "Rocket" (lol), 143k and still going.... '91 S10 Blazer 4.3Z

Reply to
Bigjfig

Reply to
daveedrussell

Reply to
daveedrussell

Take the windshweild wipers off and remove the metal cover. The VIN should be stamped on the body

Reply to
daveedrussell

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.