Re: Repeatedly Running On A Low Tank?

>> I think Toyota did the right >> thing when they eliminated the normal / severe service schedules >> and just >> went to a 5K across the board schedule. > > > This was because people were going 10-12,000 miles between changes > and > sludging their engines.

So why did changing the recommendation alter the behavior of people? If you are going to ignore a 7500/5000 recommendation, aren't you just as likely to ignore a 5k recommendation? I suppose the maintenance required light might help, but I know more than a few people who are comfortable ignoring those as well.

I was there when the campaign was on.

In Europe Toyotas have 10K mile oil change recommendations (see page

12 of
formatting link
). I wonder why in the US, they specify 5K oil changes. My SO keeps telling me that her old Toyota (a mid-80s Camry) only required 10K oil changes - I think it actually required 7500 mile oil changes, but who am I to argue with her. Either way, it was not the engine that gave her the most trouble, it was the transmission. Ed
Reply to
C. E. White
Loading thread data ...

So that people who did heed the recommendation would tighten up a little bit, and those who didn't were SOL...?

Reply to
Hachiroku

Reason number 1? Different oil spec.

** Posted from
formatting link
**
Reply to
clare at snyder dot ontario do

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.