I am considering a 1992 Ford Escort station wagon for $900. It is in fine condition except that it does need a front-right axle (note to self: H & W, Spring Hill). Body seems fine, I drove it and it did fine. It had sat for 6 months, father is selling it for son who's in rehab at the moment. (Boy, don't you love this story?) It has about 80,000 miles on it, has the 1.9 litre engine.
The main focus of my post today concerns the timing belt. I've had some state that, with Ford Engines (which this appears to be despite the Mazda heritage) it is strongly advisable that you replace the timing belt/chain because if it breaks on Ford products, due to how their belt structure is a blown belt/chain could easily result in an engine that needs replacement. Thus, the argument is made, just replace the timing belt/chain by default to prevent this. And again, this seems to made specifically regarding Ford products. Is their argument correct? Should the belt be replaced by default, or can it be inspected to ascertain its estimated useful remaining life?
If the timing belt/chain should be replaced, what price should I expect to be charged?
LRH