Which one is used in Subies? If timing belt, what is the recommended replacement interval?
- posted
4 years ago
Which one is used in Subies? If timing belt, what is the recommended replacement interval?
Which Subie? Which year? Which engine? You inquiry is extremely vague as it would cover every car that Subaru ever made.
On my old 2002 Subaru Legacy wagon (which got junked in 2016 only due to severe mechanical problems unrelated to the engine), a belt was used. The recommended replacement interval, I believe, was 60K, but I didn't bother until sometime in the 80K mileage range.
Their H6 engine has had a chain for many years, like 15 years. The EJ engine used a timing belt. The FB engine came out in 2010 and had a timing chain.
The FA version came after around 2012 and was a variant of the FB engine version.
I figured naming model year was not necessary as manufacturers prefer one method or the other for all their models. I guess later on you proved that Subaru prefers timing chains. So do I.
Some models have had timing chains many years before other models got them. Some models kept using timing belts (easier to change) because of high stress and wear (i.e., sports models). You didn't give a year range. I could've assume you meant some model in the last few years, but you might also be looking at used Subies.
The latest compact crossovers, Crosstrek/XV.
Timing chains don't need replacement. Well, the service guidelines stop at 100K miles, so they don't tell you. However, the pulley bearing or rollers will eventually need replacing due to wear. Mine needed the pulley bearing replaced after 85K, but then the leaking head gasket (a problem with several model years with Subaru) was getting replaced. Since the mechs were already there with all that apart, I had them replace the pulley. My 2002 used a belt, so I had them do it at the same time (since belts got replaced at about 60K and I was already up to
85K). Replacing the timing chain, pulleys, or rollers usually gets done when you have some other repair requiring pulling the cover plate on the front, or until there is a failure (which could be the timing won't hold or drift). If they're already pulling it apart, might as well as have them look at and repair the timing chain, pulley, rollers if needed instead of paying again for the labor.I can't remember which car I owned a long time ago when its timing belt broke. It was a non-interference engine, so it was like the engine turned off. I managed to steer the car to the shoulder to get it towed. I was in the right lane, so getting onto the shoulder wasn't having to maneuver through traffic.
DOHC - Interference engine SOHC - Non-interference engine
My 2002 Legacy is a SOHC engine, and uses a timing belt. If it breaks, I lose all engine power and hopefully can struggle with the steering wheel (no longer having power assist) to get the car off the road.
The Crosstrek has a DOHC engine. If the timing chain breaks, the pistons smash against the valves and the engine self destructs.
Just copied this from a maintenance schedule:
"Note all 2019 Forester, Outback, Ascent, Legacy, Impreza, BRZ, Crosstrek, and WRX have a timing chain which doesn't need replacement"
STI still has a belt which needs replacement at 96k miles.
For any vehicle with a timing belt, mileage is just one consideration. The age of the belt is just as important. Rubber timing belts, like tires, age and deteriorate even if the car is not a high-mileage vehicle. When I took my 12-year-old WRX in for service the shop recommmended changing the timing belt even though the car had less than
60,000 miles. The techs and service advisors always say "That's a great car!". I hope to keep it that way for many more years.
Of course it said miles or months. I just neglected to mention it.
Ah yes- yet another product of dumbed-down government schools ,-)
Ah yes, yet another product or out dumbed-down, politically correct educational system
MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.