Proper octane fuel for 4.9L L6?

1995 E250 cargo van 4.9L inline 6 with 176k miles here. Was just wondering if there would be any advantage or performance gain to be had using premium (93) vs plus (89) with this engine. I had always thought to use plus in a six cylinder and premium in a v8 but have been curious about this. Any thoughts?

thanks Jay

Reply to
Ford Warrior
Loading thread data ...

those engines were made low compression ,so 89 will work fine.the higher the compression ,the higher the octane needed. dont think youll notice much difference using premium.

formatting link

Reply to
ds549

On Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:45:15 -0500, Ford Warrior rearranged some electrons to form:

No need to spend the money. It is designed to run on 87.

Reply to
David M

You are wasting your money burning plus.

Reply to
Advocate

Running high octane fuel will not net you anything but a lighter wallet. High octane does not equal more power. In fact, the higher the octane number, the slower the fuel will burn... Stick with the

87.
Reply to
invalid unparseable

So the general concensus would be just to go with the Regular 87 fuel?

Thanks

Reply to
Ford Warrior

Not true, 9 to 1 and better compression is no place for 87 octane. It is in owner manual for sales reasons and the only reason some engine have knoc senxors it for 87 octane compatibilty, not for emissions ans every time ECM retards the spark to control knock, it is reducing power and MPG plain and simple. I use plus or better in all my cars and have for years. Even my wife 2000 4cyl Cherokee gains about 2 mpg in city/urban driving with 89 or better gas run better and smoother too. I have a 89

4x4 burb that I have had since new and now has 176K miles on it and it will get 19mpg or better on highway with A/C and 93 in tank and runs great and never pings no matter what. Long ago the best it every did on 87 was about 16 once without A/C and usually 14mpg with A/C on on highway and tended to knock and have a lot less power on hills too. It has not had a tank of 87 for many years now. Personally I think 87 should be taken off the market because it is a through back to the days on 8 to 1 compression in the 70's. Rhet should just have 89 and 93 or so and just two stocks instead of three would reduce the price on 89 too and allow detriot to biuld cars with higher compression for better thermodynamic effieceny and better MPG.
Reply to
TheSnoMan

MotorsForum website is not affiliated with any of the manufacturers or service providers discussed here. All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.