I think it depends greatly on where you live. I think I know exactly 2
people who drive vehicles that aren't American, everyone else drives GM (a
couple of Ford's and Dodge's in there too). We build GM's, Ford's, and
Chrysler's here, so we know they are good cars. That Chevy Impala your
friend or relative just purchased was actually built only a few minutes from
my house, at GM's Oshawa, Ontario plant, which happens to be one of the
highest rated plants in the world. The plant has won 19 J.D Power awards
since 1999, and was even awarded the Founder's Award in 2008. Also, Harbor
Consulting rates Oshawa's #1 plant (the car plant) as the second most
efficient in North America, only being beat by the Oshawa #2 (truck) plant.
We also build the Camaro, so you know there has to be something good to it
When the national news implied
a "fire sale" at Chrysler dealers,
I looked into the Chrysler PT Cruiser.
But first, a check at EDMUNDS car reports.
The PT cruiser....
dated design and features, 21 mpg out of a 4 banger engine,
Sounds like a car they designed, then stopped improving.
Then, the base price..... $21 GRAND $
It might have sold at half the price,
but when you look at the competition in that price range,
it's easy to see why Chrysler's in trouble.
On Mon, 18 May 2009 08:50:38 -0400, "80 Knight"
It will be 1/2 price by fall, maybe less. While the dealers are trying to
keep their inventory low, it is so they don't get stuck too bad. Behind
that, there are tons of unsold all around. Usually in a field somewhere as
the dealers didn't buy them.
Most will get auctioned off.
But at only 21 MPG, why not buy a real truck like a F150. Nearly as good
milleage, big V8 for lots of power and reliability and they will likely be
in business for awhile yet.
But if someone were to insist on a GM or Chrysler, I would be looking for
40% off of MSRP, warranty in writing backed by the government; cash and GOOD
credit is king. And there is not a shortage of inventory, just qualified
buyers are scarce. Will be 50% off by fall.
At no time did I say I was a Bush Republican !!
You don't like the message, so you attack the messenger ?
My main point was that; The Cruiser was overpriced,
and that in that price range, there's alot better choices.
there's a helluva lot better
Who in the hell mentioned anything like that? "Americans like you"
translates to "Bush Republicans?" OK, whatever.
I don't see it like that.
So buy one of the "better" choices and stop wasting bandwidth. Nobody
here cares what you choose to buy and drive.
If you're happy with your purchase, great. That's all that matters.
What concept here is so difficult for you to grasp?
No, no, you mistake what I meant. I meant that you are an illiterate moron,
as has been demonstrated by your rash of terrible post's over time.
It isn't that I didn't like the message, it was that the message was a lie.
A base PT Cruiser does not start at $21,000 (they start at $18,720), and
they don't get 21 MPG, they get 26 MPG. As for your comments about it's
design, that is a matter of opinion, and nothing more.
If you were that interested in a PT Cruiser, what the hell do you consider
to be a similar vehicle? As for price range, though I am not a fan of the
PT, I have driven one for a couple of weeks, and actually enjoyed it. I
consider the price to be fair, but it would be nice if they could get more
power out of that engine.
Slightly off topic, the local Chrysler dealership apparently does something
They sell TONS of cars (and were not on the kill list) in this small
This has to be due to good prices and easy financing, since these cars are
not really known for their quality.
Motorsforum.com is a website by car enthusiasts for car enthusiasts. It is not affiliated with any of the car or spare part manufacturers or car dealers discussed here.
All logos and trade names are the property of their respective owners.